These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1008 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30187156)

  • 21. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Simillis C; Lal N; Thoukididou SN; Kontovounisios C; Smith JJ; Hompes R; Adamina M; Tekkis PP
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 30720507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach.
    Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Inada R; Takawa M; Moriya Y
    Dig Surg; 2011; 28(5-6):404-9. PubMed ID: 22189000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].
    Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Prete FP; Pezzolla A; Prete F; Testini M; Marzaioli R; Patriti A; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Gurrado A; Strippoli GFM
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jun; 267(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28984644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
    Baek SJ; Al-Asari S; Jeong DH; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Kim NK
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4157-63. PubMed ID: 23708725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.
    Iwamoto M; Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):143. PubMed ID: 28764707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
    Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.
    Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
    Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Feng Y; Zhu J; Ding J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 20(4):432-438. PubMed ID: 28440525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Martin ST; Heneghan HM; Winter DC
    Br J Surg; 2012 May; 99(5):603-12. PubMed ID: 22246846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sun XY; Xu L; Lu JY; Zhang GN
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Jun; 28(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 30688139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Memon S; Heriot AG; Murphy DG; Bressel M; Lynch AC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2095-101. PubMed ID: 22350601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Pędziwiatr M; Małczak P; Mizera M; Witowski J; Torbicz G; Major P; Pisarska M; Wysocki M; Budzyński A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):595-604. PubMed ID: 28795243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.