362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30187398)
1. Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):158-172. PubMed ID: 30187398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Taking time to take perspective? Rapidly changing reference frames in the avatar-Simon task.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103005. PubMed ID: 32058077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of body direction and posture on taking the perspective of a humanoid avatar in a virtual environment.
Ueda S; Nagamachi K; Nakamura J; Sugimoto M; Inami M; Kitazaki M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261063. PubMed ID: 34932598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Action effect consistency and body ownership in the avatar-Simon task.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220817. PubMed ID: 31398233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reversed effect of spatial compatibility when taking avatar's perspective.
Müsseler J; Ruhland L; Böffel C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1539-1549. PubMed ID: 30134768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial-numerical associations in the presence of an avatar.
Böffel C; Herbst C; Lindemann O; Müsseler J
Psychol Res; 2021 Oct; 85(7):2588-2598. PubMed ID: 33026539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Seeing the world through the eyes of an avatar? Comparing perspective taking and referential coding.
von Salm-Hoogstraeten S; Bolzius K; Müsseler J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):264-273. PubMed ID: 32077741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prioritization of self-relevant perspectives in ageing.
Mattan BD; Quinn KA; Acaster SL; Jennings RM; Rotshtein P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jun; 70(6):1033-1052. PubMed ID: 26652616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No evidence for automatic response activation with target onset in the avatar-compatibility task.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 32529527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceived Ownership of Avatars Influences Visual Perspective Taking.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():743. PubMed ID: 29887816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Object affordances from the perspective of an avatar.
Arend MG; Müsseler J
Conscious Cogn; 2021 Jul; 92():103133. PubMed ID: 33971501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age of avatar modulates the altercentric bias in a visual perspective-taking task: ERP and behavioral evidence.
Ferguson HJ; Brunsdon VEA; Bradford EEF
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1298-1319. PubMed ID: 30242574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perspective Taking and Avatar-Self Merging.
Müsseler J; von Salm-Hoogstraeten S; Böffel C
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():714464. PubMed ID: 35369185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective.
Pavone EF; Tieri G; Rizza G; Tidoni E; Grisoni L; Aglioti SM
J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(2):268-79. PubMed ID: 26758821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multisensory integration of visual cues from first- to third-person perspective avatars in the perception of self-motion.
Giroux M; Barra J; Graff C; Guerraz M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2634-2655. PubMed ID: 33864205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural representations of self versus other: visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game.
David N; Bewernick BH; Cohen MX; Newen A; Lux S; Fink GR; Shah NJ; Vogeley K
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 18(6):898-910. PubMed ID: 16839298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From Embodiment of a Point-Light Display in Virtual Reality to Perception of One's Own Movements.
Giroux M; Barra J; Barraud PA; Graff C; Guerraz M
Neuroscience; 2019 Sep; 416():30-40. PubMed ID: 31377453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is it always me first? Effects of self-tagging on third-person perspective-taking.
Mattan B; Quinn KA; Apperly IA; Sui J; Rotshtein P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1100-17. PubMed ID: 25528086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mere observation of body discontinuity affects perceived ownership and vicarious agency over a virtual hand.
Tieri G; Tidoni E; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1247-59. PubMed ID: 25618006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
