These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30187584)

  • 1. A spatially explicit hierarchical model to characterize population viability.
    Campbell SP; Zylstra ER; Darst CR; Averill-Murray RC; Steidl RJ
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Dec; 28(8):2055-2065. PubMed ID: 30187584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial and temporal variation in survival of a rare reptile: a 22-year study of Sonoran desert tortoises.
    Zylstra ER; Steidl RJ; Jones CA; Averill-Murray RC
    Oecologia; 2013 Sep; 173(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 23011852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling spatial variation in avian survival and residency probabilities.
    Saracco JF; Royle JA; DeSante DF; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1885-91. PubMed ID: 20715606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models.
    Sun CC; Royle JA; Fuller AK
    Ecology; 2019 Sep; 100(9):e02777. PubMed ID: 31168779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling trends from North American breeding bird survey data: a spatially explicit approach.
    Bled F; Sauer J; Pardieck K; Doherty P; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81867. PubMed ID: 24349141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fine-scale analysis reveals cryptic landscape genetic structure in desert tortoises.
    Latch EK; Boarman WI; Walde A; Fleischer RC
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27794. PubMed ID: 22132143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the contribution of immigration to population dynamics: a review of methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals.
    Millon A; Lambin X; Devillard S; Schaub M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2019 Dec; 94(6):2049-2067. PubMed ID: 31385391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane.
    Servanty S; Converse SJ; Bailey LL
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Jul; 24(5):927-37. PubMed ID: 25154087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the abundance of forest types across the eastern United States through inverse modelling of tree demography.
    Vanderwel MC; Rozendaal DMA; Evans MEK
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Oct; 27(7):2128-2141. PubMed ID: 28675670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vegetation cover, topography, and low-traffic roads influence Sonoran desert tortoise (Gopherus morafkai) movement and habitat selection.
    Sutor S; McIntyre NE; Griffis-Kyle KL
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Sep; 12(1):68. PubMed ID: 39350278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferences about population dynamics from count data using multistate models: a comparison to capture-recapture approaches.
    Zipkin EF; Sillett TS; Grant EH; Chandler RB; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Feb; 4(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 24634726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population and evolutionary dynamics in spatially structured seasonally varying environments.
    Reid JM; Travis JMJ; Daunt F; Burthe SJ; Wanless S; Dytham C
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 Aug; 93(3):1578-1603. PubMed ID: 29575449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking Genetic Kinship and Demographic Analyses to Characterize Dispersal: Methods and Application to Blanding's Turtle.
    Reid BN; Thiel RP; Palsbøll PJ; Peery MZ
    J Hered; 2016; 107(7):603-614. PubMed ID: 27552818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling.
    Karanth KU; Nichols JD; Kumar NS; Hines JE
    Ecology; 2006 Nov; 87(11):2925-37. PubMed ID: 17168036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity analyses of spatial population viability analysis models for species at risk and habitat conservation planning.
    Naujokaitis-Lewis IR; Curtis JM; Arcese P; Rosenfeld J
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 18798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A spatially explicit approach to estimating species occupancy and spatial correlation.
    Hui C; McGeoch MA; Warren M
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 16903051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating population dynamics models and distance sampling data: a spatial hierarchical state-space approach.
    Nadeem K; Moore JE; Zhang Y; Chipman H
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1735-1745. PubMed ID: 27859153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.