These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30188409)

  • 1. Meta-analysis indicates that add-on devices and new endoscopes reduce colonoscopy adenoma miss rate.
    Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Facciorusso A; Muscatiello N; Triantafyllou K
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1482-1490. PubMed ID: 30188409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.
    Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Dimitriadis GD; Triantafyllou K
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 23(21):3784-3796. PubMed ID: 28638218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New-generation full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, tandem colonoscopy trial (J-FUSE Study).
    Kudo T; Saito Y; Ikematsu H; Hotta K; Takeuchi Y; Shimatani M; Kawakami K; Tamai N; Mori Y; Maeda Y; Yamada M; Sakamoto T; Matsuda T; Imai K; Ito S; Hamada K; Fukata N; Inoue T; Tajiri H; Yoshimura K; Ishikawa H; Kudo SE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Nov; 88(5):854-864. PubMed ID: 29908178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.
    Moriyama T; Uraoka T; Esaki M; Matsumoto T
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Apr; 27 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 25556542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies.
    Brand EC; Dik VK; van Oijen MGH; Siersema PD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):376-385.e2. PubMed ID: 28069476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.
    Dik VK; Moons LM; Siersema PD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 20(9):2200-11. PubMed ID: 24605019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy is associated with a lower adenoma miss rate: a multicenter randomized tandem study.
    Triantafyllou K; Polymeros D; Apostolopoulos P; Lopes Brandao C; Gkolfakis P; Repici A; Papanikolaou IS; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Alexandrakis G; Hassan C
    Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 28763808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study.
    Dik VK; Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Belderbos TD; Moons LM; Segev M; Domanov S; Rex DK; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Dec; 47(12):1151-8. PubMed ID: 26220283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [New Colonoscopy Devices to Improve Colon Neoplasm Detection].
    Shin SJ
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 68(6):293-296. PubMed ID: 28025471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emerging technological advancements in colonoscopy: Third Eye® Retroscope® and Third Eye® Panoramic(TM) , Fuse® Full Spectrum Endoscopy® colonoscopy platform, Extra-Wide-Angle-View colonoscope, and NaviAid(TM) G-EYE(TM) balloon colonoscope.
    Gralnek IM
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 25251748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature.
    Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Spartalis E; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K
    World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 24(37):4243-4253. PubMed ID: 30310257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Triantafyllou K; Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Papanikolaou IS; Fuccio L; Hassan C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(9):1158-1170. PubMed ID: 30863002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.
    Pasha SF; Leighton JA; Das A; Harrison ME; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Fleischer DE; Sharma VK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 107(3):363-70; quiz 371. PubMed ID: 22186978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.
    Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technological advances for improving adenoma detection rates: The changing face of colonoscopy.
    Ishaq S; Siau K; Harrison E; Tontini GE; Hoffman A; Gross S; Kiesslich R; Neumann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2017 Jul; 49(7):721-727. PubMed ID: 28454854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
    Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.
    Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial.
    Papanikolaou IS; Apostolopoulos P; Tziatzios G; Vlachou E; Sioulas AD; Polymeros D; Karameris A; Panayiotides I; Alexandrakis G; Dimitriadis GD; Triantafyllou K
    Endoscopy; 2017 May; 49(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28107765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.