These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30188952)

  • 1. Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.
    Learmonth G; Märker G; McBride N; Pellinen P; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203549. PubMed ID: 30188952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
    Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related reduction of hemispheric lateralisation for spatial attention: An EEG study.
    Learmonth G; Benwell CSY; Thut G; Harvey M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():139-151. PubMed ID: 28343987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults.
    Learmonth G; Papadatou-Pastou M
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2022 Jun; 32(2):438-457. PubMed ID: 33890188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.
    Striemer CL; Russell K; Nath P
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27206500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between collisions and pseudoneglect: is it right?
    Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L; Oriet C
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 21696716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateral spatial biases in naturalistic and simulated driving: Does pseudoneglect influence performance?
    Smith AK; Vicencio-Moreira R; Friedrich TE; Flath ME; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    Laterality; 2024 Jan; 29(1):97-116. PubMed ID: 37962492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.
    Chen J; Kaur J; Abbas H; Wu M; Luo W; Osman S; Niemeier M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212998. PubMed ID: 30845258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential shift in spatial bias over time depends on observers׳ initial bias: Observer subtypes, or regression to the mean?
    Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Abe R; Zoratti MT; Martins AC; van den Bogert PC; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():33-40. PubMed ID: 25234646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The right-side perceptual bias in aging determined in a laboratory setting and during a virtual driving task.
    Hämäläinen H; Rashid Izullah F; Koivisto M; Takio F; Luimula M
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Feb; 59(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 29356011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks.
    Elias LJ; Robinson B; Saucier DM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 16293359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between spatial cognition and walking trajectory for passing through a doorway: evident in individuals with dominant right eye?
    Kitayama S; Fujikake H; Kokubu M; Higuchi T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):797-807. PubMed ID: 25432626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.