187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30189868)
1. Surgeons' and methodologists' perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study.
Cook JA; Campbell MK; Gillies K; Skea Z
Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):478. PubMed ID: 30189868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time to be BRAVE: is educating surgeons the key to unlocking the potential of randomised clinical trials in surgery? A qualitative study.
Potter S; Mills N; Cawthorn SJ; Donovan J; Blazeby JM
Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():80. PubMed ID: 24628821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve? A qualitative study.
Davies G; Mills N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Trials; 2020 Apr; 21(1):316. PubMed ID: 32252788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 'The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual': a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology.
Strong S; Paramasivan S; Mills N; Wilson C; Donovan JL; Blazeby JM
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17(1):212. PubMed ID: 27113592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design.
Cook JA; Elders A; Boachie C; Bassinga T; Fraser C; Altman DG; Boutron I; Ramsay CR; MacLennan GS
Trials; 2015 May; 16():241. PubMed ID: 26025450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials.
Donovan JL; Paramasivan S; de Salis I; Toerien M
Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():5. PubMed ID: 24393291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.
Hussain-Gambles M; Leese B; Atkin K; Brown J; Mason S; Tovey P
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Oct; 8(42):iii, 1-109. PubMed ID: 15488164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Embedding qualitative research in randomised controlled trials to improve recruitment: findings from two recruitment optimisation studies of orthopaedic surgical trials.
Scantlebury A; McDaid C; Brealey S; Cook E; Sharma H; Ranganathan A; Adamson J;
Trials; 2021 Jul; 22(1):461. PubMed ID: 34274006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A qualitative study exploring the acceptability of the McNulty-Zelen design for randomised controlled trials evaluating educational interventions.
McNulty C; Ricketts EJ; Rugman C; Hogan A; Charlett A; Campbell R;
BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Nov; 16():169. PubMed ID: 26577832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol.
Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Brehaut J; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Zwarenstein M; Graham ID; McKenzie JE; McIntyre L; Jairath V; Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M
BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 30458809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials.
Dimairo M; Boote J; Julious SA; Nicholl JP; Todd S
Trials; 2015 Sep; 16():430. PubMed ID: 26416387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician Perceptions of the Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials.
Sedrak MS; Sun V; Liu J; George K; Wong AR; Dale W; Dizon DS
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911528. PubMed ID: 31532517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Emerging designs in orthopaedics: expertise-based randomized controlled trials.
Scholtes VA; Nijman TH; van Beers L; Devereaux PJ; Poolman RW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():24-8. PubMed ID: 22810443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the CARPET1 trial.
Jackson CJ; Dixon-Woods M; Eborall H; Kenyon S; Toozs-Hobson P; Tincello DG
Clin Trials; 2010 Dec; 7(6):696-704. PubMed ID: 20729253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding thoracic surgeons' perceptions of administrative database analyses and guidelines in clinical decision-making.
Shemanski KA; Farias A; Lieu D; Kim AW; Wightman S; Atay SM; Canter RJ; David EA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Mar; 161(3):807-816.e1. PubMed ID: 33139063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-sectional Survey.
Yu J; Chen W; Chen S; Jia P; Su G; Li Y; Sun X
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1065-1069. PubMed ID: 29916881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.
Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Zwarenstein M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; McKenzie JE; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M;
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):765. PubMed ID: 31870433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative methodological approach to randomized trial for surgical procedures routinely used.
Filleron T; Lusque A; Dalenc F; Ferron G; Roche H; Martinez A; Jouve E
Contemp Clin Trials; 2018 May; 68():109-115. PubMed ID: 29608972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
