These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30190204)

  • 21. [Guidelines Clearing House Statement "Hypertension". Summary and recommendations for a rational hypertension guideline in Germany].
    Donner-Banzhoff N; Echterhoff HH; Hense HW; Kunz R; Sawicki P; Thürmann P; Jonitz G; Ollenschläger G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Jun; 94(5):341-9. PubMed ID: 10939145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physicians' views on public reporting of hospital quality data.
    Barr JK; Bernard SL; Sofaer S; Giannotti TE; Lenfestey NF; Miranda DJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2008 Dec; 65(6):655-73. PubMed ID: 18596176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.
    Scott A; Sivey P; Ait Ouakrim D; Willenberg L; Naccarella L; Furler J; Young D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD008451. PubMed ID: 21901722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
    Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
    Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Quality of health care in Germany. A six-country comparison].
    Sawicki PT
    Med Klin (Munich); 2005 Nov; 100(11):755-68. PubMed ID: 16328186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.
    Emmert M; Sauter L; Jablonski L; Sander U; Taheri-Zadeh F
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e275. PubMed ID: 28747292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria.
    Guetz B; Bidmon S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278510. PubMed ID: 36584030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [On the comprehensibility of German hospital quality reports: systematic evaluation and need for action].
    Friedemann J; Schubert HJ; Schwappach D
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Jan; 71(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 19173143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18374. PubMed ID: 32687479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health care public reporting utilization - user clusters, web trails, and usage barriers on Germany's public reporting portal Weisse-Liste.de.
    Pross C; Averdunk LH; Stjepanovic J; Busse R; Geissler A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28431546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of public performance reporting by general practitioners: a study of perceptions and referral behaviours.
    Prang KH; Canaway R; Bismark M; Dunt D; Kelaher M
    BMC Fam Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 29433449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hospital quality reports in Germany: patient and physician opinion of the reported quality indicators.
    Geraedts M; Schwartze D; Molzahn T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Sep; 7():157. PubMed ID: 17903244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The German Guideline Clearinghouse on Breast Cancer: the need for frequent updating of breast cancer guidelines requires effective guideline updating procedures].
    Weingart O; Sonntag D; Trapp H; Bartsch HH; Baumeister RG; Goerke K; Giersiepen K; Hindenburg HJ; Ming K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Störkel S; Kober T; Thole H; Kirchner H; Ollenschläger G;
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):403-11. PubMed ID: 15487388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.