BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30191628)

  • 21. Advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in extremely obese women (BMI>35) with early-stage endometrial cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Litta P; Meir Y; Surico D; Leo L; Fusco A; Angioni S; Cicinelli E
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2497-502. PubMed ID: 24778066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic-Assisted Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Cancers: Technique and Surgical Outcomes.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 29683877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparison of different approaches in surgical management of early endometrial cancer].
    Bats AS; Chatellier G; Clément D; Larousserie F; Lefrère-Belda MA; Lecuru F; Nos C
    Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):1003-7. PubMed ID: 18055318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.
    Rabinovich A
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 27(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 26134173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of obesity on the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer.
    Mahdi H; Jernigan AM; Aljebori Q; Lockhart D; Moslemi-Kebria M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 25064420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
    Barrie A; Freeman AH; Lyon L; Garcia C; Conell C; Abbott LH; Littell RD; Powell CB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 27621195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
    Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
    Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: a multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers.
    Fader AN; Seamon LG; Escobar PF; Frasure HE; Havrilesky LA; Zanotti KM; Secord AA; Boggess JF; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Skafianos G; Rossi E; Gehrig PA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Aug; 126(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22555102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
    Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative Surgical Outcomes for Endometrial Cancer Patients 65 Years Old or Older Staged With Robotics or Laparotomy.
    Doo DW; Guntupalli SR; Corr BR; Sheeder J; Davidson SA; Behbakht K; Jarrett MJ; Guy MS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(11):3687-94. PubMed ID: 25672563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does Surgical Teaching Take Time? Resident Participation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
    Freeman AH; Barrie A; Lyon L; Conell C; Garcia C; Littell RD; Powell CB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 28336363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.