669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30193543)
1. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Pan J; Zhang X; Shi Y; Pei Q
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 30193543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis.
Zhang HP; Wu W; Yang S; Lin J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1345-53. PubMed ID: 27367942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Zhang J; Liu M; Li H; Chen J; Su H; Zheng J; Lin G; Lei X
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 42(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28750769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoloop ligation after endoscopic mucosal resection using a transparent cap: A novel method to treat small rectal carcinoid tumors.
Zhang DG; Luo S; Xiong F; Xu ZL; Li YX; Yao J; Wang LS
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(10):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 30886508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos).
Yang DH; Park Y; Park SH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 May; 83(5):1015-22; quiz 1023-.e6. PubMed ID: 26460225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Strategies for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Within 20 mm.
Yu Q; Zhang Y; Su Y; Zhao Q; Xiong K; Zhang L; Fang H
Am Surg; 2024 Jun; 90(6):1176-1186. PubMed ID: 38192125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; Choi CW; Kim SJ; Nam HS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 21(31):9387-93. PubMed ID: 26309365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: a meta-analysis.
He L; Deng T; Luo H
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jan; 56(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25510749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic resection therapies for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou X; Xie H; Xie L; Li J; Cao W; Fu W
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Feb; 29(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24118068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EMR-P for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: is it a preferred treatment?
Liu Z; Zheng C; Ding S; Chen C; Yang J; Wu R; Sun D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 57(12):1503-1508. PubMed ID: 35758188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤10mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou C; Zhang F; We Y
Ann Saudi Med; 2023; 43(3):179-195. PubMed ID: 37270677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Circumferential Incision and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumor.
Chen R; Liu X; Sun S; Wang S; Ge N; Wang G; Guo J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun; 26(3):e56-61. PubMed ID: 27213787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Endoscopic Treatment Outcome of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Removed by Ligation-assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Resection].
Gu MG; Lee SH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 72(3):128-134. PubMed ID: 30270594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Zheng JC; Zheng K; Zhao S; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Jiang CG
Z Gastroenterol; 2020 Feb; 58(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 32050284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with incomplete endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumor.
Choi CW; Park SB; Kang DH; Kim HW; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5006-5011. PubMed ID: 28936630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal carcinoid tumor. A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single-arm analysis.
Yong JN; Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Lim LKE; Lim GEH; Quek J; Tham HY; Wong NW; Tan KK; Chong CS
J Dig Dis; 2021 Oct; 22(10):562-571. PubMed ID: 34472210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumor.
Kim J; Kim JH; Lee JY; Chun J; Im JP; Kim JS
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):77. PubMed ID: 29866049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Lee WH; Kim SW; Lim CH; Kim JS; Cho YK; Lee IS; Choi MG; Choi KY
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4313-8. PubMed ID: 23807754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of the resectability and long-term results from 46 consecutive cases.
Kaneko H; Hirasawa K; Koh R; Kobayashi R; Kokawa A; Tanaka K; Maeda S
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 51(12):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27687741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection.
Lee DS; Jeon SW; Park SY; Jung MK; Cho CM; Tak WY; Kweon YO; Kim SK
Endoscopy; 2010 Aug; 42(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 20669076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
