These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30193574)
1. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial. Ezhar Y; D'Aragon F; Echave P BMC Anesthesiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 30193574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation by the Bonfils retromolar fiberscope: a randomized controlled study. Boker A; Almarakbi WA; Arab AA; Almazrooa AA Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Oct; 21(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22428493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. COMPARISON OF THE BONFILS INTUBATION FIBRESCOPE VERSUS C-MAC VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE. Lee AH; Nor NM; Izaham A; Yahya N; Tang SS; Manap NA Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Jun; 23(5):517-25. PubMed ID: 27487637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial. Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hemodynamic responses and QTc intervals to tracheal intubation with the McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope in elderly patients. Colak F; Ozgul U; Erdogan MA; Kayhan GE; Erdil FA; Çolak C; Durmus M Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 35(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 30848023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study. Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different videolaryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Abdelgawad AF; Shi QF; Halawa MA; Wu ZL; Wu ZY; Chen XD; Yao SL J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2015 Jun; 35(3):432-438. PubMed ID: 26072085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with the Glidescope videolaryngoscope: a comparison of oral and nasal routes. Xue FS; Xu YC; Liu QJ; Yang QY; Liu Y; Liao X; Li XY Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2008 Mar; 46(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18390395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial. Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between the Bonfils Intubation Fiberscope and McCoy laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Abdullah HR; Li-Ming T; Marriott A; Wong TG Anesth Analg; 2013 Nov; 117(5):1217-20. PubMed ID: 24029854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope Versus Optiscope Video Stylet for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Manual Inline Cervical Stabilization: A Randomized Trial. Yoon HK; Lee HC; Park JB; Oh H; Park HP Anesth Analg; 2020 Apr; 130(4):870-878. PubMed ID: 31567321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bonfils fiberscope: intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes without neuromuscular blockade. Najafi A; Rahimi E; Shariat Moharari R; Hussain Khan Z Acta Med Iran; 2011; 49(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 21713728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intubation of non-difficult airways using video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a randomized, parallel-group study. Liu DX; Ye Y; Zhu YH; Li J; He HY; Dong L; Zhu ZQ BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 May; 19(1):75. PubMed ID: 31092191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between bougies and stylets for simulated tracheal intubation with the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope. Batuwitage B; McDonald A; Nishikawa K; Lythgoe D; Mercer S; Charters P Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):400-5. PubMed ID: 24675430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hands-Off Time for Endotracheal Intubation during CPR Is Not Altered by the Use of the C-MAC Video-Laryngoscope Compared to Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy. A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Schuerner P; Grande B; Piegeler T; Schlaepfer M; Saager L; Hutcherson MT; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155997. PubMed ID: 27195693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine versus additional intravenous lidocaine with propofol during tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled study. Seangrung R; Pasutharnchat K; Injampa S; Kumdang S; Komonhirun R BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):265. PubMed ID: 34717532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with Truview PCD™, McGrath® and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized prospective study. Tempe DK; Chaudhary K; Diwakar A; Datt V; Virmani S; Tomar AS; Mohandas A; Mohire VB Ann Card Anaesth; 2016; 19(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26750677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of laryngoscope types on hemodynamic response and optic nerve sheath diameter. McCoy, Macintosh, and C-MAC video-laryngoscope. Küçükosman G; Aydın BG; Gülçek N; Okyay RD; Pişkin Ö; Ayoğlu H Saudi Med J; 2020 Sep; 41(9):930-937. PubMed ID: 32893274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope to Assist Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe Insertion in Intubated Patients. Kavrut Ozturk N; Kavakli AS J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Feb; 31(1):191-196. PubMed ID: 27498268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]