457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30194017)
1. The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation test intensity on the amplitude, variability and reliability of motor evoked potentials.
Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 1700():190-198. PubMed ID: 30194017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longer Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intertrial Interval Increases Size, Reduces Variability, and Improves the Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials.
Hassanzahraee M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Connect; 2019 Dec; 9(10):770-776. PubMed ID: 31744309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent.
Raco V; Bauer R; Norim S; Gharabaghi A
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 28779945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities.
Schaworonkow N; Triesch J; Ziemann U; Zrenner C
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 30268710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Covariation of the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in a resting hand muscle.
Vallence AM; Rurak BK; Fujiyama H; Hammond GR
Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar; 241(3):927-936. PubMed ID: 36811686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-session reliability of short-interval intracortical inhibition measured by threshold tracking TMS.
Matamala JM; Howells J; Dharmadasa T; Trinh T; Ma Y; Lera L; Vucic S; Burke D; Kiernan MC
Neurosci Lett; 2018 May; 674():18-23. PubMed ID: 29501687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effects of Waveform and Current Direction on the Efficacy and Test-Retest Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Davila-Pérez P; Jannati A; Fried PJ; Cudeiro Mazaira J; Pascual-Leone A
Neuroscience; 2018 Nov; 393():97-109. PubMed ID: 30300705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for the assessment of knee extensor muscle function.
Temesi J; Ly SN; Millet GY
J Neurol Sci; 2017 Apr; 375():442-449. PubMed ID: 28320184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter- and intra-subject variability of motor cortex plasticity following continuous theta-burst stimulation.
Vallence AM; Goldsworthy MR; Hodyl NA; Semmler JG; Pitcher JB; Ridding MC
Neuroscience; 2015 Sep; 304():266-78. PubMed ID: 26208843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Welch JF; Argento PJ; Mitchell GS; Fox EJ
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2020 Dec; 129(6):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 33031020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ongoing cumulative effects of single TMS pulses on corticospinal excitability: An intra- and inter-block investigation.
Pellicciari MC; Miniussi C; Ferrari C; Koch G; Bortoletto M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):621-628. PubMed ID: 25823698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The minimal number of TMS trials required for the reliable assessment of corticospinal excitability, short interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation.
Biabani M; Farrell M; Zoghi M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S
Neurosci Lett; 2018 May; 674():94-100. PubMed ID: 29551425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-stimulus theta power is correlated with variation of motor evoked potential latency: a single-pulse TMS study.
İşcan Z; Schurger A; Vernet M; Sitt JD; Valero-Cabré A
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):3003-3014. PubMed ID: 30116864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cavaleri R; Schabrun SM; Chipchase LS
Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):48. PubMed ID: 28264713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A higher number of TMS-elicited MEP from a combined hotspot improves intra- and inter-session reliability of the upper limb muscles in healthy individuals.
Bastani A; Jaberzadeh S
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47582. PubMed ID: 23077645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Near-threshold recruitment characteristics of motor evoked potentials in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Demjan M; Säisänen L; Reijonen J; Rissanen S; Määttä S; Julkunen P
Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 1805():148284. PubMed ID: 36796474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-related differences in short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition in a human hand muscle.
Opie GM; Semmler JG
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(5):665-72. PubMed ID: 25088463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
