457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30194017)
21. Intra-rater reliability of a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to obtain motor evoked potentials.
Livingston SC; Ingersoll CD
Int J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 118(2):239-56. PubMed ID: 18205080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability.
Goldsworthy MR; Hordacre B; Ridding MC
Neuroscience; 2016 Apr; 320():205-9. PubMed ID: 26872998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Consistency of evoked responses to dual-stimulator, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in the lower limb of people with multiple sclerosis.
Meaney A; Collett J; Dawes H; Howells K; Izadi H
J Clin Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1434-7. PubMed ID: 26154149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prestimulus cortical EEG oscillations can predict the excitability of the primary motor cortex.
Ogata K; Nakazono H; Uehara T; Tobimatsu S
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(6):1508-1516. PubMed ID: 31235367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Corticomotor responses to triple-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: Effects of interstimulus interval and stimulus intensity.
Sacco P; Turner D; Rothwell J; Thickbroom G
Brain Stimul; 2009 Jan; 2(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20633401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.
Murray LM; Knikou M
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 237(7):1841-1852. PubMed ID: 31079235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physiological processes influencing motor-evoked potential duration with voluntary contraction.
van den Bos MA; Geevasinga N; Menon P; Burke D; Kiernan MC; Vucic S
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1156-1162. PubMed ID: 28031404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of TMS measurements using conventional hand-hold method with different numbers of stimuli for tibialis anterior muscle in healthy adults.
Su B; Jia Y; Zhang L; Li D; Shen Q; Wang C; Chen Y; Gao F; Wei J; Huang G; Liu H; Wang L
Front Neural Circuits; 2022; 16():986669. PubMed ID: 36247728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Resting Motor Threshold, MEP and TEP Variability During Daytime.
Ter Braack EM; de Goede AA; van Putten MJAM
Brain Topogr; 2019 Jan; 32(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 30019114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Randomising stimulus intensity improves the variability and reliability of the assessment of corticospinal excitability.
Suckley JJ; Waters TJ; Tran M; Stapley PJ; Shemmell J; Walsh JA; McAndrew DJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Aug; 342():108813. PubMed ID: 32562710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.
van Hedel HJ; Murer C; Dietz V; Curt A
J Neurol; 2007 Aug; 254(8):1089-98. PubMed ID: 17431701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Biabani M; Fornito A; Coxon JP; Fulcher BD; Rogasch NC
J Physiol; 2021 Jun; 599(11):2907-2932. PubMed ID: 33599980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Demonstration of facilitatory I wave interaction in the human motor cortex by paired transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Ziemann U; Tergau F; Wassermann EM; Wischer S; Hildebrandt J; Paulus W
J Physiol; 1998 Aug; 511 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):181-90. PubMed ID: 9679173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differences in Motor Evoked Potentials Induced in Rats by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation under Two Separate Anesthetics: Implications for Plasticity Studies.
Sykes M; Matheson NA; Brownjohn PW; Tang AD; Rodger J; Shemmell JB; Reynolds JN
Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():80. PubMed ID: 27766073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differentiation of motor evoked potentials elicited from multiple forearm muscles: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography.
Neva JL; Gallina A; Peters S; Garland SJ; Boyd LA
Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 1676():91-99. PubMed ID: 28935187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of motor cortical excitability using evoked torque responses: A new tool with high reliability.
Dharia AK; Gardi A; Vogel AK; Dutt-Mazumder A; Krishnan C
J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Jan; 348():108998. PubMed ID: 33189794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Modulation of short-latency afferent inhibition and short-interval intracortical inhibition by test stimulus intensity and motor-evoked potential amplitude.
Miyaguchi S; Kojima S; Sasaki R; Tamaki H; Onishi H
Neuroreport; 2017 Dec; 28(18):1202-1207. PubMed ID: 29064955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Variability of motor cortical excitability using a novel mapping procedure.
Littmann AE; McHenry CL; Shields RK
J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Apr; 214(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 23357026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modulation of short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition with increasing motor evoked potential amplitude in a human hand muscle.
Opie GM; Semmler JG
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jul; 125(7):1440-50. PubMed ID: 24345316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
