183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30194444)
1. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance.
Gandevia S
Spinal Cord; 2018 Sep; 56(9):821-822. PubMed ID: 30194444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional research and biomedical journals: Poor quality articles and honest researchers!
Maisonneuve H; Slim K
J Visc Surg; 2015 Nov; 152(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 26476677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Authorship for Early Scientific Researchers: Ethics and Responsibility.
Deora H
World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():510-511. PubMed ID: 31756506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
Maffia P
Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Cost of Scientific Misconduct.
Tarazi C
Pediatr Res; 2015 Nov; 78(5):482. PubMed ID: 26263444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?
Chrousos GP; Kalantaridou SN; Margioris AN; Gravanis A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Mar; 42(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 22268677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sisyphus desperately seeking publisher.
Molinie A; Bodenhausen G
J Biosci; 2018 Mar; 43(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 29485111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraud and dishonesty in "scientific" publication.
Nayernouri T
Arch Iran Med; 2009 Jan; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19111022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
Hadi MA
Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sanctions for research misconduct in cardiothoracic surgery journals.
Sade RM;
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 152(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 27530635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of Dutch doctors finds evidence of widespread research misconduct.
Sheldon T
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2898. PubMed ID: 22522820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?
Bouter LM
Account Res; 2015; 22(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 25635847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Keeping us all honest: publication ethics and AJA.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2014 Jun; 33(2):71. PubMed ID: 24902484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship among factors affecting research misconduct in medical sciences in Iran.
Mardani A; Nakhoda M; Shamsi Gooshki E
Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):417-443. PubMed ID: 32544348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research.
Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5475. PubMed ID: 31527134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Statement of Concern.
Ward TN
Headache; 2017 May; 57(5):697-698. PubMed ID: 28444945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Journal publication ethics 201: culture in crisis?
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Mar; 194(3):553. PubMed ID: 20198741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
Bosch X
J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
