These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30194624)

  • 1. One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation.
    Mulhern B; Norman R; Street DJ; Viney R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Jan; 37(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 30194624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.
    Wang H; Rowen DL; Brazier JE; Jiang L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 May; 21(3):405-418. PubMed ID: 36997744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.
    Bahrampour M; Byrnes J; Norman R; Scuffham PA; Downes M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Sep; 21(7):983-992. PubMed ID: 32367379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
    Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
    Clark MD; Determann D; Petrou S; Moro D; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):883-902. PubMed ID: 25005924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.
    De Brún A; Flynn D; Ternent L; Price CI; Rodgers H; Ford GA; Rudd M; Lancsar E; Simpson S; Teah J; Thomson RG
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):483. PubMed ID: 29929523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
    Williams G; Kinchin I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.
    Trapero-Bertran M; Rodríguez-Martín B; López-Bastida J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219905. PubMed ID: 31318926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
    Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
    Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand.
    Pattanaphesaj J; Thavorncharoensap M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Tongsiri S; Ingsrisawang L; Teerawattananon Y
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Oct; 18(5):551-558. PubMed ID: 29958008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(8):661-77. PubMed ID: 18620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the valuation of paediatric health-related quality of life: a qualitative study protocol.
    Yu A; Luo Y; Bahrampour M; Norman R; Street D; Viney R; Devlin N; Mulhern BJ;
    BMJ Open; 2023 Aug; 13(8):e073039. PubMed ID: 37532476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.
    Quaife M; Terris-Prestholt F; Di Tanna GL; Vickerman P
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1053-1066. PubMed ID: 29380229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
    Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?
    Mulhern B; Norman R; Shah K; Bansback N; Longworth L; Viney R
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):306-318. PubMed ID: 29084472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.