These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30194911)

  • 1. A collaborative, mixed-methods evaluation of a low-cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry.
    Conkle J; Keirsey K; Hughes A; Breiman J; Ramakrishnan U; Suchdev PS; Martorell R
    Matern Child Nutr; 2019 Apr; 15(2):e12686. PubMed ID: 30194911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reliability of a low-cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry.
    Conkle J; Suchdev PS; Alexander E; Flores-Ayala R; Ramakrishnan U; Martorell R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205320. PubMed ID: 30356325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of a handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometric measurements in population-based household surveys and surveillance platforms: an effectiveness validation study in Guatemala, Kenya, and China.
    Bougma K; Mei Z; Palmieri M; Onyango D; Liu J; Mesarina K; Akelo V; Mwando R; Zhou Y; Meng Y; Jefferds ME
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2022 Jul; 116(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 35285874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspective: Are We Ready to Measure Child Nutritional Status with Lasers?
    Conkle J; Martorell R
    Adv Nutr; 2019 Jan; 10(suppl_1):S10-S16. PubMed ID: 30721957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of Fully Automated 3D Imaging System for Child Anthropometry in a Low-Resource Setting: Effectiveness Evaluation in Malakal, South Sudan.
    Leidman E; Jatoi MA; Bollemeijer I; Majer J; Doocy S
    JMIR Biomed Eng; 2022 Oct; 7(2):e40066. PubMed ID: 38875695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of measurements performed by community-drawn anthropometrists from rural Ethiopia.
    Ayele B; Aemere A; Gebre T; Tadesse Z; Stoller NE; See CW; Yu SN; Gaynor BD; McCulloch CE; Porco TC; Emerson PM; Lietman TM; Keenan JD
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30345. PubMed ID: 22291939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Handheld 3D scanning as a minimally invasive measuring technique for neonatal anthropometry.
    Andrews ET; Ashton JJ; Pearson F; Beattie RM; Johnson MJ
    Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2019 Oct; 33():279-282. PubMed ID: 31451267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptability and Experiences with the Use of 3D Scans to Measure Anthropometry of Young Children in Surveys and Surveillance Systems from the Perspective of Field Teams and Caregivers.
    Jefferds MED; Mei Z; Palmieri M; Mesarina K; Onyango D; Mwando R; Akelo V; Liu J; Zhou Y; Meng Y; Bougma K
    Curr Dev Nutr; 2022 Jun; 6(6):nzac085. PubMed ID: 35755937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional surface scanners compared with standard anthropometric measurements for head shape.
    Beaumont CAA; Knoops PGM; Borghi A; Jeelani NUO; Koudstaal MJ; Schievano S; Dunaway DJ; Rodriguez-Florez N
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):921-927. PubMed ID: 28454666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability.
    Bragança S; Arezes P; Carvalho M; Ashdown SP; Castellucci I; Leão C
    Work; 2018; 59(3):325-339. PubMed ID: 29630575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of anthropometry training and feasibility of 3D imaging on anthropometry data quality among children under five years in a postmortem setting.
    Gupta PM; Sivalogan K; Oliech R; Alexander E; Klein J; Addo OY; Gethi D; Akelo V; Blau DM; Suchdev PS
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0292046. PubMed ID: 37768936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated anthropometric phenotyping with novel Kinect-based three-dimensional imaging method: comparison with a reference laser imaging system.
    Soileau L; Bautista D; Johnson C; Gao C; Zhang K; Li X; Heymsfield SB; Thomas D; Zheng J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2016 Apr; 70(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 26373966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the quality of child anthropometry: Manual anthropometry in the Body Imaging for Nutritional Assessment Study (BINA).
    Conkle J; Ramakrishnan U; Flores-Ayala R; Suchdev PS; Martorell R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189332. PubMed ID: 29240796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation study of a Kinect based body imaging system.
    Bragança S; Arezes P; Carvalho M; Ashdown SP; Xu B; Castellucci I
    Work; 2017; 57(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 28506007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of length measurements of the lower limb by using EOS™.
    Clavé A; Maurer DG; Nagra NS; Fazilleau F; Lefèvre C; Stindel E
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Aug; 102(2):165-171. PubMed ID: 29094321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional facial anthropometry of unilateral cleft lip infants with a structured light scanning system.
    Li G; Wei J; Wang X; Wu G; Ma D; Wang B; Liu Y; Feng X
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 23664802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements agreement between low-cost and high-level handheld 3D scanners to scan the knee for designing a 3D printed knee brace.
    Dessery Y; Pallari J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190585. PubMed ID: 29320560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Child body shape measurement using depth cameras and a statistical body shape model.
    Park BK; Lumeng JC; Lumeng CN; Ebert SM; Reed MP
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 25323820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of a Microsoft Kinect-based 3D scanning system for taking body segment girth measurements: a comparison to ISAK and ISO standards.
    Clarkson S; Wheat J; Heller B; Choppin S
    J Sports Sci; 2016; 34(11):1006-14. PubMed ID: 26358314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and intraobserver reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared with conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents from a population-based cohort study.
    Glock F; Vogel M; Naumann S; Kuehnapfel A; Scholz M; Hiemisch A; Kirsten T; Rieger K; Koerner A; Loeffler M; Kiess W
    Pediatr Res; 2017 May; 81(5):736-744. PubMed ID: 28052064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.