These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30195078)

  • 21. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
    Yim GW; Eoh KJ; Chung YS; Kim SW; Kim S; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim YT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 29287717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic review.
    Waters PS; Cheung FP; Peacock O; Heriot AG; Warrier SK; O'Riordain DS; Pillinger S; Lynch AC; Stevenson ARL
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 May; 22(5):488-499. PubMed ID: 31400185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
    Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou J; Xiong BH; Ma L; Cheng Y; Huang W; Zhao L
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25823530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
    Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].
    Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
    Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Abdelsattar A; King A; Brazil G; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Baruelo G; Govindan M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():190-202. PubMed ID: 37690282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
    Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sexual, bladder, bowel and ovarian function 1 year after robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Wallin E; Falconer H; Rådestad AF
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1404-1412. PubMed ID: 31237957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative analysis of genitourinary function after type C1 robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus type C2 robotic radical hysterectomy.
    Paek J; Kang E; Lim PC
    Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():58-62. PubMed ID: 31500786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
    Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.