These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30195078)

  • 41. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
    Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Trends and comparative effectiveness of inpatient radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States (2012-2015).
    Uppal S; Rebecca Liu J; Kevin Reynolds R; Rice LW; Spencer RJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):133-138. PubMed ID: 30424895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
    Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Chang SH; Huang KG; Yang LY; Pan YB; Lai CH; Chou HH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Sep; 35(5):e60. PubMed ID: 38425140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
    Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Sun CC; Dos Reis R; Schmeler KM; Nick AM; Westin SN; Brown J; Levenback CF; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 21872911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative analysis of robotic
    Chen L; Liu LP; Wen N; Qiao X; Meng YG
    World J Clin Cases; 2019 Oct; 7(20):3185-3193. PubMed ID: 31667168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-centre experience from India.
    Sekhon R; Naithani A; Makkar P; R P; Sharma P; Rawal S; Goyal Y; Mitra S; Sharma A; Mehta A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):935-941. PubMed ID: 34709536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Kim S; Min KJ; Lee S; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
    Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 32467009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Is Not Superior to Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Perioperative Urologic Complications: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW; Kim SR; Kim JH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 31315060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Matanes E; Abitbol J; Kessous R; Kogan L; Octeau D; Lau S; Salvador S; Gotlieb WH
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Apr; 41(4):450-458. PubMed ID: 30529223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.
    Soliman PT; Langley G; Munsell MF; Vaniya HA; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):1355-9. PubMed ID: 23054117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
    Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
    Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.