48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30195136)
1. Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.
Fine AB; Jaeger TF; Farmer TA; Qian T
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77661. PubMed ID: 24204909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. It is not what you say but how you say it: Evidence from Russian shows robust effects of the structural prior on noisy channel inferences.
Poliak M; Ryskin R; Braginsky M; Gibson E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; 50(4):637-649. PubMed ID: 37213180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Explicit (Not Implicit) Attitudes Mediate the Focus of Attention During Sentence Processing.
Horchak OV; Garrido MV
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():583814. PubMed ID: 33424698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Without his shirt off he saved the child from almost drowning: interpreting an uncertain input.
Frazier L; Clifton C
Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 30(6):635-647. PubMed ID: 25984551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agrammatic output in non-fluent, including Broca's, aphasia as a rational behavior.
Fedorenko E; Ryskin R; Gibson E
Aphasiology; 2023; 37(12):1981-2000. PubMed ID: 38213953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The transposed word effect is consistent with serial word recognition and varies with reading speed.
Hossain J; White AL
Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105512. PubMed ID: 37331325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Even lawyers do not like legalese.
MartÃnez E; Mollica F; Gibson E
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(23):e2302672120. PubMed ID: 37253008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rational speech comprehension: Interaction between predictability, acoustic signal, and noise.
Van Os M; Kray J; Demberg V
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():914239. PubMed ID: 36591096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transposed-word effects in speeded grammatical decisions to sequences of spoken words.
Dufour S; Mirault J; Grainger J
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22035. PubMed ID: 36543850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transposed-word effects when reading serially.
Mirault J; Vandendaele A; Pegado F; Grainger J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277116. PubMed ID: 36355749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A resource-rational model of human processing of recursive linguistic structure.
Hahn M; Futrell R; Levy R; Gibson E
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(43):e2122602119. PubMed ID: 36260742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.
Martin IA; Goupell MJ; Huang YT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):699. PubMed ID: 35232101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehenders model the nature of noise in the environment.
Ryskin R; Futrell R; Kiran S; Gibson E
Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():141-150. PubMed ID: 30195136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.
Gibson E; Bergen L; Piantadosi ST
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 May; 110(20):8051-6. PubMed ID: 23637344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we rely on good-enough processing in reading under auditory and visual noise?
Zdorova N; Malyutina S; Laurinavichyute A; Kaprielova A; Ziubanova A; Lopukhina A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0277429. PubMed ID: 36693033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of context on noisy-channel sentence comprehension.
Chen S; Nathaniel S; Ryskin R; Gibson E
Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105503. PubMed ID: 37302257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference.
Goodman ND; Frank MC
Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 20(11):818-829. PubMed ID: 27692852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.
Traxler MJ
Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Nov; 18(11):605-11. PubMed ID: 25200381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
