These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30195136)

  • 81. Neural correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in autism spectrum disorders.
    Tesink CM; Buitelaar JK; Petersson KM; van der Gaag RJ; Kan CC; Tendolkar I; Hagoort P
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1941-52. PubMed ID: 19423680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events.
    Farmer TA; Fine AB; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):413-433. PubMed ID: 26652283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Probabilistic modeling of discourse-aware sentence processing.
    Dubey A; Keller F; Sturt P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):425-51. PubMed ID: 23616488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements.
    Nation K; Marshall CM; Altmann GT
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2003 Dec; 86(4):314-29. PubMed ID: 14623215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. The case of the missing pronouns: does mentally simulated perspective play a functional role in the comprehension of person?
    Sato M; Bergen BK
    Cognition; 2013 Jun; 127(3):361-74. PubMed ID: 23545386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Evaluating Treatment and Generalization Patterns of Two Theoretically Motivated Sentence Comprehension Therapies.
    Des Roches CA; Vallila-Rohter S; Villard S; Tripodis Y; Caplan D; Kiran S
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Dec; 25(4S):S743-S757. PubMed ID: 27997950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. [Neural mechanisms of syntax].
    Nagai C
    Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 2006 Nov; 46(11):855-7. PubMed ID: 17432200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Judgements about double-embedded relative clauses differ between languages.
    Frank SL; Ernst P
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1581-1593. PubMed ID: 29687232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. The Use of Linguistic Cues in Sentence Comprehension by Mandarin-Speaking Children with High-Functioning Autism.
    Zhou P; Crain S; Gao L; Jia M
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2017 Jan; 47(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 27830426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Identifying speech acts from contextual and linguistic information.
    Abbeduto L; Furman L; Davies B
    Lang Speech; 1989; 32 ( Pt 3)():189-203. PubMed ID: 2640474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Does morphology make the difference? Agrammatic sentence comprehension in German.
    Burchert F; De Bleser R; Sonntag K
    Brain Lang; 2003 Nov; 87(2):323-42. PubMed ID: 14585301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Motor resonance as a function of narrative time: further tests of the linguistic focus hypothesis.
    Zwaan RA; Taylor LJ; de Boer M
    Brain Lang; 2010 Mar; 112(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 19144398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. The contribution of fronto-parietal regions to sentence comprehension: insights from the Moses illusion.
    Raposo A; Marques JF
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():431-7. PubMed ID: 23796543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Robust effects of predictability across experimental contexts: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhang W; Chow WY; Liang B; Wang S
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107229. PubMed ID: 31610184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Imitated Prosodic Fluency Predicts Reading Comprehension Ability in Good and Poor High School Readers.
    Breen M; Kaswer L; Van Dyke JA; Krivokapić J; Landi N
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1026. PubMed ID: 27486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Reading comprehension in children with specific language impairment: an examination of two subgroups.
    Kelso K; Fletcher J; Lee P
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2007; 42(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 17365085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension.
    Fine AB; Florian Jaeger T
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Apr; 37(3):578-91. PubMed ID: 23363004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Noise-induced differences in the complexity of spoken language.
    Pham CT; Karuza EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jul; 76(7):1609-1631. PubMed ID: 36053158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. [Taal: een introductie].
    Wijnen FNK; de Boer JN
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2023; 65(3):136-138. PubMed ID: 36951766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Warm (for Winter): Inferring Comparison Classes in Communication.
    Tessler MH; Goodman ND
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Mar; 46(3):e13095. PubMed ID: 35297089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.