These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30195576)

  • 1. Accuracy of blinded clinician interpretation of single-lead smartphone electrocardiograms and a proposed clinical workflow.
    Koshy AN; Sajeev JK; Negishi K; Wong MC; Pham CB; Cooray SP; Khavar Y; Roberts L; Cooke JC; Teh AW
    Am Heart J; 2018 Nov; 205():149-153. PubMed ID: 30195576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph in dogs: Comparison with standard 6-lead electrocardiography.
    Vezzosi T; Buralli C; Marchesotti F; Porporato F; Tognetti R; Zini E; Domenech O
    Vet J; 2016 Oct; 216():33-7. PubMed ID: 27687923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can smartphone wireless ECGs be used to accurately assess ECG intervals in pediatrics? A comparison of mobile health monitoring to standard 12-lead ECG.
    Gropler MRF; Dalal AS; Van Hare GF; Silva JNA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204403. PubMed ID: 30260996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and variability of cardiologist interpretation of single lead electrocardiograms for atrial fibrillation: The VITAL-AF trial.
    Pipilas DC; Khurshid S; Atlas SJ; Ashburner JM; Lipsanopoulos AT; Borowsky LH; Guan W; Ellinor PT; McManus DD; Singer DE; Chang Y; Lubitz SA
    Am Heart J; 2023 Nov; 265():92-103. PubMed ID: 37451355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network.
    Hannun AY; Rajpurkar P; Haghpanahi M; Tison GH; Bourn C; Turakhia MP; Ng AY
    Nat Med; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 30617320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wireless Smartphone ECG Enables Large-Scale Screening in Diverse Populations.
    Haberman ZC; Jahn RT; Bose R; Tun H; Shinbane JS; Doshi RN; Chang PM; Saxon LA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 25651872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved accuracy and confidence with multiple-lead recordings from a single-lead mobile electrocardiographic device.
    Frisch DR; Weiss M; Dikdan SJ; Keith SW; Sarkar K
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 42(9):1191-1196. PubMed ID: 31400010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of heart rate and rhythm with a smartphone-based electrocardiograph versus a reference standard electrocardiograph in dogs and cats.
    Kraus MS; Gelzer AR; Rishniw M
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2016 Jul; 249(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 27379594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse.
    Kraus MS; Rishniw M; Divers TJ; Reef VB; Gelzer AR
    Res Vet Sci; 2019 Aug; 125():141-147. PubMed ID: 31228737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of combining serial smartphone single-lead electrocardiograms for the diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
    Muhlestein JB; Anderson JL; Bethea CF; Severance HW; Mentz RJ; Barsness GW; Barbagelata A; Albert D; Le VT; Bunch TJ; Yanowitz F; May HT; Chisum B; Ronnow BS; Muhlestein JB;
    Am Heart J; 2020 Mar; 221():125-135. PubMed ID: 31986289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE; Deluca DC; Chien CH; Helfenbein ED; Ariet M
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 22995382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of smartphone-based and standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy dairy cows.
    Bonelli F; Vezzosi T; Meylan M; Nocera I; Ferrulli V; Buralli C; Meucci V; Tognetti R
    J Vet Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 33(2):981-986. PubMed ID: 30592089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiovascular screening in low-income settings using a novel 4-lead smartphone-based electrocardiograph (D-Heart®).
    Maurizi N; Faragli A; Imberti J; Briante N; Targetti M; Baldini K; Sall A; Cisse A; Berzolari FG; Borrelli P; Avvantaggiato F; Perlini S; Marchionni N; Cecchi F; Parigi G; Olivotto I
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 236():249-252. PubMed ID: 28215467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information on myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias added by prehospital electrocardiograms.
    Boothroyd LJ; Segal E; Bogaty P; Nasmith J; Eisenberg MJ; Boivin JF; Vadeboncœur A; de Champlain F
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 23414085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the accuracy of an automated atrial fibrillation detection algorithm using smartphone technology: The iREAD Study.
    William AD; Kanbour M; Callahan T; Bhargava M; Varma N; Rickard J; Saliba W; Wolski K; Hussein A; Lindsay BD; Wazni OM; Tarakji KG
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1561-1565. PubMed ID: 30143448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SPEAR Trial: Smartphone Pediatric ElectrocARdiogram Trial.
    Nguyen HH; Van Hare GF; Rudokas M; Bowman T; Silva JN
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136256. PubMed ID: 26295569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing computerized eye tracking technology for gaining insight into expert interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram: an objective quantitative approach.
    Bond RR; Zhu T; Finlay DD; Drew B; Kligfield PD; Guldenring D; Breen C; Gallagher AG; Daly MJ; Clifford GD
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):895-906. PubMed ID: 25110276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the high-frequency cutoff of bandpass filtering on ECG quality and clinical interpretation: A comparison between 40Hz and 150Hz cutoff in a surgical preoperative adult outpatient population.
    Ricciardi D; Cavallari I; Creta A; Di Giovanni G; Calabrese V; Di Belardino N; Mega S; Colaiori I; Ragni L; Proscia C; Nenna A; Di Sciascio G
    J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 27498055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy foals and comparison to standard base-apex electrocardiography.
    Bindi F; Vezzosi T; Sala G; Freccero F; Marmorini P; Bonelli F; Sgorbini M
    Vet Res Commun; 2024 Apr; 48(2):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 37947988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the efficacy of hand-held computer screens for cardiologists' interpretations of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Pettis KS; Savona MR; Leibrandt PN; Maynard C; Lawson WT; Gates KB; Wagner GS
    Am Heart J; 1999 Oct; 138(4 Pt 1):765-70. PubMed ID: 10502225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.