These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30195846)
1. Grade Groups Provide Improved Predictions of Pathological and Early Oncologic Outcomes Compared with Gleason Score Risk Groups. Kirmiz S; Qi J; Babitz SK; Linsell S; Denton B; Singh K; Auffenberg G; Montie JE; Lane BR J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):278-283. PubMed ID: 30195846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score. Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients. Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer. Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance. Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens. Mori K; Sharma V; Comperat EM; Sato S; Laukhtina E; Schuettfort VM; Pradere B; Parizi MK; Karakiewicz PI; Egawa S; Tilki D; Boorjian SA; Shariat SF Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1172-1178. PubMed ID: 33371950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival. Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group. Teeter AE; Bañez LL; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ; J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1980-4; discussion 1985. PubMed ID: 18801519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single Positive Lymph Node Prostate Cancer Can Be Treated Surgically without Recurrence. Kim DK; Koo KC; Abdel Raheem A; Kim KH; Chung BH; Choi YD; Rha KH PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152391. PubMed ID: 27031340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy. Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study. Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Stabile A; Moschini M; Cucchiara V; Zaffuto E; Karakiewicz PI; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A Prostate; 2017 Feb; 77(3):263-273. PubMed ID: 27753114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical, Pathological and Oncologic Findings of Radical Prostatectomy with Extraprostatic Extension Diagnosed on Preoperative Prostate Biopsy. Faisal FA; Tosoian JJ; Han M; Macura KJ; Pavlovich CP; Lotan TL J Urol; 2019 May; 201(5):937-942. PubMed ID: 30414957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease. Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Murata Y; Tatsugami K; Yoshikawa M; Hamaguchi M; Yamada S; Hayakawa Y; Ueda K; Momosaki S; Sakamoto N Int J Urol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):284-289. PubMed ID: 29315854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer. Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Number of metastatic lymph nodes as determinant of outcome after salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer. Gugliemetti G; Sukhu R; Conca Baenas MA; Meeks J; Sjoberg DD; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Touijer K Actas Urol Esp; 2016 Sep; 40(7):434-9. PubMed ID: 27184342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]