186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30196573)
1. Effect of non-compliant balloon postdilatation on magnesium-based bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Tröbs M; Marwan M; Weissner M; Nef H; Schlundt C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30196573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical properties of the drug-eluting bioresorbable magnesium scaffold compared with polymeric scaffolds and a permanent metallic drug-eluting stent.
Barkholt TØ; Webber B; Holm NR; Ormiston JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):E674-E682. PubMed ID: 31710149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Post-dilatation after implantation of bioresorbable everolimus- and novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study of acute mechanical effects.
Blachutzik F; Boeder N; Wiebe J; Mattesini A; Dörr O; Most A; Bauer T; Röther J; Tröbs M; Schlundt C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 106(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 27757522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography.
Cuculi F; Bossard M; Zasada W; Moccetti F; Voskuil M; Wolfrum M; Malinowski KP; Toggweiler S; Kobza R
Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001204. PubMed ID: 32076567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnesium versus poly-L-lactic acid bioresorbable scaffolds: in vivo optical coherence tomography comparison of mechanical performance.
Abellás-Sequeiros RA; Ocaranza-Sanchez R; Galvaõ-Braga C; Marques J; Gonzalez-Juanatey C
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2020; 90(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31996867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is high pressure postdilation safe in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds? Optical coherence tomography observations after noncompliant balloons inflated at more than 24 atmospheres.
Fabris E; Caiazzo G; Kilic ID; Serdoz R; Secco GG; Sinagra G; Lee R; Foin N; Di Mario C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):839-46. PubMed ID: 26370357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Major coronary evaginations following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - Clinical and OCT characteristics.
Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Marwan M; Röther J; Tröbs M; Schneider R; Nef H; Weissner M; Schlundt C
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jun; 20(6):485-491. PubMed ID: 30097188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overlapping implantation of bioresorbable novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study.
Blachutzik F; Boeder N; Wiebe J; Mattesini A; Dörr O; Most A; Bauer T; Tröbs M; Röther J; Schlundt C; Achenbach S; Hamm C; Nef H
Heart Vessels; 2017 Jul; 32(7):781-789. PubMed ID: 28004176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Side-Branch Dilation Techniques After Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Implantation: A Bench Study.
de Pommereau A; Mogi S; de Hemptinne Q; Adjedj J; Varenne O; Picard F
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):E249-E255. PubMed ID: 31368896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Plaque Composition, Morphology, and Burden on DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Expansion and Eccentricity - An Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Elsässer A; Möllmann H; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jun; 20(6):480-484. PubMed ID: 30638889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serial invasive imaging follow-up of the first clinical experience with the Magmaris magnesium bioresorbable scaffold.
Tovar Forero MN; van Zandvoort L; Masdjedi K; Diletti R; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):226-231. PubMed ID: 31033171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of acute scaffold recoil after implantation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: an optical coherence tomography assessment in native coronary arteries.
Sato T; Jose J; El-Mawardy M; Sulimov DS; Tölg R; Richardt G; Abdel-Wahab M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 27761749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute Mechanical Performance of Magmaris vs. DESolve Bioresorbable Scaffolds in a Real-World Scenario.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Koepp T; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Elsässer A; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():696287. PubMed ID: 34195239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. First Report of Edge Vascular Response at 12 Months of Magmaris, A Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold, Assessed by Grayscale Intravascular Ultrasound, Virtual Histology, and Optical Coherence Tomography. A Biosolve-II Trial Sub-Study.
Hideo-Kajita A; Garcia-Garcia HM; Haude M; Joner M; Koolen J; Ince H; Abizaid A; Toelg R; Lemos PA; von Birgelen C; Christiansen EH; Wijns W; Neumann FJ; Kaiser C; Eeckhout E; Teik LS; Escaned J; Azizi V; Kuku KO; Ozaki Y; Dan K; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 May; 20(5):392-398. PubMed ID: 31079817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance.
Mattesini A; Secco GG; Dall'Ara G; Ghione M; Rama-Merchan JC; Lupi A; Viceconte N; Lindsay AC; De Silva R; Foin N; Naganuma T; Valente S; Colombo A; Di Mario C
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):741-50. PubMed ID: 25060016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absorb GT1 Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System - 1-Year Post-Marketing Surveillance in Japan.
Suzuki N; Kozuma K; Nakamura S; Aramaki K; Saito S; Shibata Y; Nanasato M; Fujii K; Kusano H; Ediebah D; Nakamura M
Circ J; 2019 Nov; 83(12):2460-2465. PubMed ID: 31708522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early collapse causing stenosis in a resorbable magnesium scaffold.
Marynissen T; McCutcheon K; Bennett J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):310-312. PubMed ID: 30019823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndrome-the initial report from the Magmaris-ACS registry.
Wlodarczak A; Lanocha M; Jastrzebski A; Pecherzewski M; Szudrowicz M; Jastrzebski W; Nawrot J; Lesiak M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):E287-E292. PubMed ID: 30537203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Assessment of effectiveness and security in high pressure postdilatation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds during percutaneous coronary intervention. Study in a contemporary, non-selected cohort of Spanish patients".
Abellas-Sequeiros RA; Ocaranza-Sanchez R; Galvão Braga C; Raposeiras-Roubin S; Lopez-Otero D; Cid-Alvarez B; Souto-Castro P; Trillo-Nouche R; Gonzalez-Juanatey JR
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 219():264-70. PubMed ID: 27343418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
