These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30198555)

  • 1. Mechanical incompatibility caused by modifications of multiple male genital structures using genomic introgression in Drosophila.
    Tanaka KM; Kamimura Y; Takahashi A
    Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2406-2418. PubMed ID: 30198555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digest: The importance of genital morphology in Drosophila copulation
    Werry N
    Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2567-2568. PubMed ID: 30298918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetric mismatch in strain-specific genital morphology causes increased harm to Drosophila females.
    Masly JP; Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2014 Aug; 68(8):2401-11. PubMed ID: 24758304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drosophila pachea asymmetric lobes are part of a grasping device and stabilize one-sided mating.
    Rhebergen FT; Courtier-Orgogozo V; Dumont J; Schilthuizen M; Lang M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):176. PubMed ID: 27586247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interspecific introgression reveals a role of male genital morphology during the evolution of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    Frazee SR; Harper AR; Afkhami M; Wood ML; McCrory JC; Masly JP
    Evolution; 2021 May; 75(5):989-1002. PubMed ID: 33433903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No evidence for external genital morphology affecting cryptic female choice and reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    LeVasseur-Viens H; Polak M; Moehring AJ
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1797-807. PubMed ID: 25962316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An innovative ovipositor for niche exploitation impacts genital coevolution between sexes in a fruit-damaging
    Muto L; Kamimura Y; Tanaka KM; Takahashi A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1887):. PubMed ID: 30257912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Major Locus Controls a Genital Shape Difference Involved in Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.
    Peluffo AE; Nuez I; Debat V; Savisaar R; Stern DL; Orgogozo V
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2893-901. PubMed ID: 26511499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeated evolution of asymmetric genitalia and right-sided mating behavior in the Drosophila nannoptera species group.
    Acurio AE; Rhebergen FT; Paulus S; Courtier-Orgogozo V; Lang M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2019 May; 19(1):109. PubMed ID: 31132984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia.
    Jagadeeshan S; Singh RS
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1058-70. PubMed ID: 16780507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic architecture and functional characterization of genes underlying the rapid diversification of male external genitalia between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana.
    Tanaka KM; Hopfen C; Herbert MR; Schlötterer C; Stern DL; Masly JP; McGregor AP; Nunes MD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 25783699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila.
    Masly JP; Dalton JE; Srivastava S; Chen L; Arbeitman MN
    Genetics; 2011 Sep; 189(1):357-74. PubMed ID: 21750260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Hagen JFD; Mendes CC; Blogg A; Payne A; Tanaka KM; Gaspar P; Figueras Jimenez J; Kittelmann M; McGregor AP; Nunes MDS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Sep; 116(38):19025-19030. PubMed ID: 31484761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the post-copulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution reveals evidence for pleiotropic harm exerted by the male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2676-86. PubMed ID: 25403358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of constraints on genital coevolution: Why do female Drosophila appear to cooperate with males by accepting harmful matings?
    Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2016 Jul; 70(7):1674-83. PubMed ID: 27174423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unraveling the Genetic Basis for the Rapid Diversification of Male Genitalia between Drosophila Species.
    Hagen JFD; Mendes CC; Booth SR; Figueras Jimenez J; Tanaka KM; Franke FA; Baudouin-Gonzalez L; Ridgway AM; Arif S; Nunes MDS; McGregor AP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Jan; 38(2):437-448. PubMed ID: 32931587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The precopulatory function of male genital spines in Drosophila ananassae[Doleschall] (Diptera: Drosophilidae) revealed by laser surgery.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2637-45. PubMed ID: 22834760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sox21b underlies the rapid diversification of a novel male genital structure between Drosophila species.
    Ridgway AM; Hood EJ; Jimenez JF; Nunes MDS; McGregor AP
    Curr Biol; 2024 Mar; 34(5):1114-1121.e7. PubMed ID: 38309269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.
    Liu J; Mercer JM; Stam LF; Gibson GC; Zeng ZB; Laurie CC
    Genetics; 1996 Apr; 142(4):1129-45. PubMed ID: 8846893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Species-specific effects of single sensillum ablation on mating position in Drosophila.
    Acebes A; Cobb M; Ferveur JF
    J Exp Biol; 2003 Sep; 206(Pt 17):3095-100. PubMed ID: 12878676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.