192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30199497)
21. Listening-Related Fatigue in New and Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Hornsby BWY; Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Gifford R
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):929-944. PubMed ID: 38379155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
Li T; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Longitudinal Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ma C; Fried J; Nguyen SA; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Camposeo EL; Meyer TA; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
Laryngoscope; 2023 May; 133(5):1014-1024. PubMed ID: 36004817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patients.
Mosnier I; Bebear JP; Marx M; Fraysse B; Truy E; Lina-Granade G; Mondain M; Sterkers-Artières F; Bordure P; Robier A; Godey B; Meyer B; Frachet B; Poncet-Wallet C; Bouccara D; Sterkers O
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 May; 141(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25763680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Murr AT; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP; Buss E; King ER; Bucker AL; Dillon SA; Rooth MA; Dedmon MM; Brown KD; Dillon MT
Laryngoscope; 2021 Sep; 131(9):2106-2111. PubMed ID: 34043247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study.
Hutter E; Argstatter H; Grapp M; Plinkert PK
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S13-21. PubMed ID: 26047068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.
Oba SI; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21389857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging.
Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Nittrouer S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Apr; 60(4):1046-1061. PubMed ID: 28384805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of behavioral speech therapy on speech sound production with adults who have cochlear implants.
Pomaville FM; Kladopoulos CN
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 23275412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relation of hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measures with speech perception measures and acceptable noise levels in cochlear implant users.
Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):416-426. PubMed ID: 32091274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.
Dornhoffer JR; Reddy P; Meyer TA; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 33410869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users.
Yoon YS; Li Y; Kang HY; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):554-65. PubMed ID: 21696329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.
Völter C; Götze L; Haubitz I; Dazert S; Thomas JP
Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():1555-1568. PubMed ID: 32982193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]