199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30199512)
21. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a review of indications, techniques, efficacy and safety.
Jain S; Deer T; Sayed D; Chopra P; Wahezi S; Jassal N; Weisbein J; Jameson J; Malinowski M; Golovac S
Pain Manag; 2020 Sep; 10(5):331-348. PubMed ID: 32609052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term clinical and radiological postoperative outcomes after an interspinous microdecompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Jalil Y; Carvalho C; Becker R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 24365893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Regarding: long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild for spinal stenosis.
Tumialán LM; Marciano FF; Theodore N
Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):252; author reply 252-3. PubMed ID: 22390527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1411-E1418. PubMed ID: 31365515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg TK; Furunes H; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e224291. PubMed ID: 35344046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. mild Interlaminar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: procedure description and case series with 1-year follow-up.
Wong WH
Clin J Pain; 2012 Jul; 28(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 22673487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Nunley PD; Patel VV; Orndorff DG; Lavelle WF; Block JE; Geisler FH
Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():1409-1417. PubMed ID: 28919727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Regarding: Dr. Tumialán et al. in response to "Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild® for spinal stenosis".
Benyamin RM; Vallejo R
Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):498. PubMed ID: 22758601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Machado GC; Ferreira PH; Yoo RI; Harris IA; Pinheiro MB; Koes BW; van Tulder MW; Rzewuska M; Maher CG; Ferreira ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD012421. PubMed ID: 27801521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Percutaneous Endoscopic Laminotomy with Flavectomy by Uniportal, Unilateral Approach for the Lumbar Canal or Lateral Recess Stenosis.
Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Jun JH
World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e129-e137. PubMed ID: 29425979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.
Thomas K; Faris P; McIntosh G; Manners S; Abraham E; Bailey CS; Paquet J; Cadotte D; Jacobs WB; Rampersaud YR; Manson NA; Hall H; Fisher CG
Spine J; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1633-1639. PubMed ID: 31195133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer.
Shabat S; Miller LE; Block JE; Gepstein R
Clin Interv Aging; 2011; 6():227-33. PubMed ID: 21966217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Indirect Decompression Effect to Central Canal and Ligamentum Flavum After Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Limthongkul W; Tanasansomboon T; Yingsakmongkol W; Tanaviriyachai T; Radcliff K; Singhatanadgige W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Sep; 45(17):E1077-E1084. PubMed ID: 32341303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression for LSS: two-year outcomes.
Chopko BW
Clin J Pain; 2013 Nov; 29(11):939-43. PubMed ID: 23446067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Zaina F; Tomkins-Lane C; Carragee E; Negrini S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD010264. PubMed ID: 26824399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kuchta J; Sobottke R; Eysel P; Simons P
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 19387698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The mild® procedure: a systematic review of the current literature.
Kreiner DS; MacVicar J; Duszynski B; Nampiaparampil DE
Pain Med; 2014 Feb; 15(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 24308292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
