These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30200879)

  • 21. Not proper ROC curves as new tool for the analysis of differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Parodi S; Pistoia V; Muselli M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():410. PubMed ID: 18834513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Hybrid One-Way ANOVA Approach for the Robust and Efficient Estimation of Differential Gene Expression with Multiple Patterns.
    Mollah MM; Jamal R; Mokhtar NM; Harun R; Mollah MN
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138810. PubMed ID: 26413858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ranking genes with respect to differential expression.
    Broberg P
    Genome Biol; 2002 Aug; 3(9):preprint0007. PubMed ID: 12225577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Support vector machine quantile regression for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray analysis.
    Sohn I; Kim S; Hwang C; Lee JW; Shim J
    Methods Inf Med; 2008; 47(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 18852921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A global approach to identify differentially expressed genes in cDNA (two-color) microarray experiments.
    Zhou Y; Cras-Méneur C; Ohsugi M; Stormo GD; Permutt MA
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2073-9. PubMed ID: 17550914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomarker identification and cancer classification based on microarray data using Laplace naive Bayes model with mean shrinkage.
    Wu MY; Dai DQ; Shi Y; Yan H; Zhang XF
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(6):1649-62. PubMed ID: 22868679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Chaotic genetic algorithm for gene selection and classification problems.
    Chuang LY; Yang CS; Li JC; Yang CH
    OMICS; 2009 Oct; 13(5):407-20. PubMed ID: 19594377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliable gene signatures for microarray classification: assessment of stability and performance.
    Davis CA; Gerick F; Hintermair V; Friedel CC; Fundel K; Küffner R; Zimmer R
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2356-63. PubMed ID: 16882647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A P-Norm Robust Feature Extraction Method for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes.
    Liu J; Liu JX; Gao YL; Kong XZ; Wang XS; Wang D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133124. PubMed ID: 26201006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection of interdependent genes via dynamic relevance analysis for cancer diagnosis.
    Sun X; Liu Y; Wei D; Xu M; Chen H; Han J
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Apr; 46(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 23124059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Human gene expression microarray analysis of the HPV 6bE7-HaCaT stable cell line.
    Zhang B; Chen X; Zhou Q; Song Y; Sun S; Cheng H
    Gene; 2018 May; 657():60-68. PubMed ID: 29501815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hierarchical gene selection and genetic fuzzy system for cancer microarray data classification.
    Nguyen T; Khosravi A; Creighton D; Nahavandi S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120364. PubMed ID: 25823003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of feature selection methods for cross-laboratory microarray analysis.
    Liu HC; Peng PC; Hsieh TC; Yeh TC; Lin CJ; Chen CY; Hou JY; Shih LY; Liang DC
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(3):593-604. PubMed ID: 24091394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A mixture model approach to detecting differentially expressed genes with microarray data.
    Pan W; Lin J; Le CT
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2003 Jul; 3(3):117-24. PubMed ID: 12844246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sample size for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Wei C; Li J; Bumgarner RE
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Nov; 5():87. PubMed ID: 15533245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.