These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30201341)

  • 1. Enhanced Ectasia Detection Using Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics.
    Ferreira-Mendes J; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Rodrigues-Barros S; Ambrósio R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 197():7-16. PubMed ID: 30201341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Ectasia Detection in Early Keratoconus Using Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments.
    Wallace HB; Vellara HR; Gokul A; McGhee CNJ; Meyer JJ
    Cornea; 2023 Dec; 42(12):1528-1535. PubMed ID: 36973879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection ability of corneal biomechanical parameters for early diagnosis of ectasia.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Heravian J; Ansari A; Shayanfar H; Moshirfar M
    Eye (Lond); 2023 Jun; 37(8):1665-1672. PubMed ID: 36038724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal Evaluation of Biomechanical Indices in Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus Classified as Having Very Asymmetric Ectasia With Normal Topography.
    Kovalchuk B; Khoramnia R; Son HS; Meis J; Winkler P; Naujokaitis T; Köppe MK; Auffarth GU; Augustin VA
    J Refract Surg; 2024 Jan; 40(1):e48-e56. PubMed ID: 38190558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined corneal biomechanical and tomographical indices in subclinical and forme fruste keratoconus.
    Ganesh M; Arora R; Titiyal JS
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38990626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Keratoconus Risk in Very Asymmetric Ectasia Using Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Parameters.
    Zhang X; Ding L; Sun L; Sun B; Huang Y; Qian Y; Zhou X
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():3569-3577. PubMed ID: 38026612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of corneal diameter on the accuracy of corneal tomography in patients with forme fruste keratoconus or thin corneas.
    Ding L; Niu L; Shi W; Zhou X; Qian Y
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 Jan; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38227767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False positive Belin-Ambrosio enhanced ectasia screening in small white-to-white diameter.
    Deshmukh R
    Eye (Lond); 2024 Apr; 38(6):1215-1216. PubMed ID: 38052866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal Ectasia Preferred Practice Pattern®.
    Jhanji V; Ahmad S; Amescua G; Cheung AY; Choi DS; Lin A; Mian SI; Rhee MK; Viriya ET; Mah FS; Varu DM;
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Apr; 131(4):P205-P246. PubMed ID: 38349299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population.
    Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of Corneal Biomechanical Behavior
    Eliasy A; Chen KJ; Vinciguerra R; Lopes BT; Abass A; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():105. PubMed ID: 31157217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of Subclinical Corneal Ectasia Using Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Assessments in a Japanese Population.
    Koh S; Ambrósio R; Inoue R; Maeda N; Miki A; Nishida K
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 35(6):383-390. PubMed ID: 31185104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tomographic and Biomechanical Scheimpflug Imaging for Keratoconus Characterization: A Validation of Current Indices.
    Steinberg J; Siebert M; Katz T; Frings A; Mehlan J; Druchkiv V; Bühren J; Linke SJ
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):840-847. PubMed ID: 30540367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Analysis of Subclinical Keratoconus With Normal Topographic, Topometric, and Tomographic Findings.
    Koc M; Aydemir E; Tekin K; Inanc M; Kosekahya P; Kiziltoprak H
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Apr; 35(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 30984982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus in Chinese Myopic Eyes by Combining Corvis ST with Pentacam.
    Zhang M; Zhang F; Li Y; Song Y; Wang Z
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):118-123. PubMed ID: 31466466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Herber R; Ramm L; Spoerl E; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Terai N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):778-788. PubMed ID: 30902432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes.
    Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Zhao D; Ren S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15379. PubMed ID: 31653884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tomographically normal partner eye in very asymmetrical corneal ectasia: biomechanical analysis.
    Fraenkel D; Hamon L; Daas L; Flockerzi E; Suffo S; Eppig T; Seitz B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Mar; 47(3):366-372. PubMed ID: 32947382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after LASIK and F-SMILE with CorVis ST.
    Abd El-Fattah EA; El Dorghamy AA; Ghoneim AM; Saad HA
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1762-1770. PubMed ID: 32698618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea.
    Esporcatte LPG; Salomão MQ; Lopes BT; Vinciguerra P; Vinciguerra R; Roberts C; Elsheikh A; Dawson DG; Ambrósio R
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2020; 7():9. PubMed ID: 32042837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.