204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30201897)
1. Comparative In Vitro and In Silico Analysis of the Selectivity of Indirubin as a Human Ah Receptor Agonist.
Faber SC; Soshilov AA; Giani Tagliabue S; Bonati L; Denison MS
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Sep; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 30201897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.
Motto I; Bordogna A; Soshilov AA; Denison MS; Bonati L
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2868-81. PubMed ID: 21981577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential gene regulation by the human and mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
Flaveny CA; Murray IA; Perdew GH
Toxicol Sci; 2010 Apr; 114(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 20044593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice.
Flaveny CA; Murray IA; Chiaro CR; Perdew GH
Mol Pharmacol; 2009 Jun; 75(6):1412-20. PubMed ID: 19299563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Naphthoquinone-Dependent Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor.
Faber SC; Giani Tagliabue S; Bonati L; Denison MS
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32526934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.
Fraccalvieri D; Soshilov AA; Karchner SI; Franks DG; Pandini A; Bonati L; Hahn ME; Denison MS
Biochemistry; 2013 Jan; 52(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 23286227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.
Odio C; Holzman SA; Denison MS; Fraccalvieri D; Bonati L; Franks DG; Hahn ME; Powell WH
Biochemistry; 2013 Mar; 52(10):1746-54. PubMed ID: 23394719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of the TCDD binding-fingerprint within the Ah receptor ligand binding domain by structurally driven mutagenesis and functional analysis.
Pandini A; Soshilov AA; Song Y; Zhao J; Bonati L; Denison MS
Biochemistry; 2009 Jun; 48(25):5972-83. PubMed ID: 19456125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of 2-azido-3-[125I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin as a probe to determine the relative ligand affinity of human versus mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cultured cells.
Ramadoss P; Perdew GH
Mol Pharmacol; 2004 Jul; 66(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 15213304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The transactivation domain of the Ah receptor is a key determinant of cellular localization and ligand-independent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling properties.
Ramadoss P; Perdew GH
Biochemistry; 2005 Aug; 44(33):11148-59. PubMed ID: 16101299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ligand binding and functional selectivity of L-tryptophan metabolites at the mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor (mAhR).
Nuti R; Gargaro M; Matino D; Dolciami D; Grohmann U; Puccetti P; Fallarino F; Macchiarulo A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Dec; 54(12):3373-83. PubMed ID: 25402742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In silico analysis of the interaction of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptors and dioxins to decipher isoform-, ligand-, and species-specific activations.
Hirano M; Hwang JH; Park HJ; Bak SM; Iwata H; Kim EY
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3795-804. PubMed ID: 25692546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ligand promiscuity of aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists and antagonists revealed by site-directed mutagenesis.
Soshilov AA; Denison MS
Mol Cell Biol; 2014 May; 34(9):1707-19. PubMed ID: 24591650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of the region of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor required for ligand dependency of transactivation using chimeric receptor between Drosophila and Mus musculus.
Kudo K; Takeuchi T; Murakami Y; Ebina M; Kikuchi H
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009; 1789(6-8):477-86. PubMed ID: 19560568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis.
Pandini A; Denison MS; Song Y; Soshilov AA; Bonati L
Biochemistry; 2007 Jan; 46(3):696-708. PubMed ID: 17223691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Divergent roles of hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 (XAP2) in human versus mouse Ah receptor complexes.
Ramadoss P; Petrulis JR; Hollingshead BD; Kusnadi A; Perdew GH
Biochemistry; 2004 Jan; 43(3):700-9. PubMed ID: 14730974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The tertiary structures of porcine AhR and ARNT proteins and molecular interactions within the TCDD/AhR/ARNT complex.
Orlowska K; Molcan T; Swigonska S; Sadowska A; Jablonska M; Nynca A; Jastrzebski JP; Ciereszko RE
J Mol Graph Model; 2016 Jun; 67():119-26. PubMed ID: 27288759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential ligand-dependent activation and a role for Y322 in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated regulation of gene expression.
Powis M; Celius T; Matthews J
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2011 Jul; 410(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 21703235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nucleotide specificity of DNA binding of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor:ARNT complex is unaffected by ligand structure.
DeGroot DE; Denison MS
Toxicol Sci; 2014 Jan; 137(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 24136190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amino acid substitutions in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain reveal YH439 as an atypical AhR activator.
Whelan F; Hao N; Furness SG; Whitelaw ML; Chapman-Smith A
Mol Pharmacol; 2010 Jun; 77(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 20231332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
