296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30202040)
41. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Nomograms for prediction of breast cancer in breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ultrasound category 4 or 5 lesions: A single-center retrospective study based on radiomics features.
Hong ZL; Chen S; Peng XR; Li JW; Yang JC; Wu SS
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():894476. PubMed ID: 36212503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Differentiation between phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma using real-time elastography.
Adamietz BR; Kahmann L; Fasching PA; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Meier-Meitinger M
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E75-9. PubMed ID: 22194044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fibroadenoma of the breast in a South African population -a pilot study of the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspirate cytology and breast ultrasonography.
Pillay S; Cheddie S; Moodley Y
Afr Health Sci; 2018 Jun; 18(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 30602953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ultrasonographic features of triple-negative breast cancer: a comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.
Yang Q; Liu HY; Liu D; Song YQ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(8):3229-32. PubMed ID: 25921124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Radiomics Analysis on Ultrasound for Prediction of Biologic Behavior in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Guo Y; Hu Y; Qiao M; Wang Y; Yu J; Li J; Chang C
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e335-e344. PubMed ID: 28890183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA.
Boerner S; Fornage BD; Singletary E; Sneige N
Cancer; 1999 Feb; 87(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10096355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Differentiation Between Phyllodes Tumors and Fibroadenomas of Breast Using Mammography-based Machine Learning Methods: A Preliminary Study.
Deng XY; Cao PW; Nan SM; Pan YP; Yu C; Pan T; Dai G
Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Oct; 23(7):729-736. PubMed ID: 37481337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Sonoelastomics for Breast Tumor Classification: A Radiomics Approach with Clustering-Based Feature Selection on Sonoelastography.
Zhang Q; Xiao Y; Suo J; Shi J; Yu J; Guo Y; Wang Y; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):1058-1069. PubMed ID: 28233619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
Menezes GLG; Pijnappel RM; Meeuwis C; Bisschops R; Veltman J; Lavin PT; van de Vijver MJ; Mann RM
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. EMD-DWT based transform domain feature reduction approach for quantitative multi-class classification of breast lesions.
Ara SR; Bashar SK; Alam F; Hasan MK
Ultrasonics; 2017 Sep; 80():22-33. PubMed ID: 28499122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses.
Koning JL; Davenport KP; Poole PS; Kruk PG; Grabowski JE
J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Diagnosis and treatment of breast fibroadenomas by ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Sperber F; Blank A; Metser U; Flusser G; Klausner JM; Lev-Chelouche D
Arch Surg; 2003 Jul; 138(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 12860764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography.
Taskin F; Koseoglu K; Ozbas S; Erkus M; Karaman C
J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Jun; 40(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 22508447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. S-Detect characterization of focal breast lesions according to the US BI RADS lexicon: a pictorial essay.
Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Spatafora L; Dimarco M; Gagliardo C; Taibbi A
J Ultrasound; 2020 Jun; 23(2):207-215. PubMed ID: 32185702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Intensity-Invariant Texture Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses.
Lo CM; Moon WK; Huang CS; Chen JH; Yang MC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2039-48. PubMed ID: 25843514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Machine learning for diagnostic ultrasound of triple-negative breast cancer.
Wu T; Sultan LR; Tian J; Cary TW; Sehgal CM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(2):365-373. PubMed ID: 30343454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
