144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30202835)
1. Hemostatic gingival retraction agents and their impact on prosthodontic treatment steps: A narrative review.
Maischberger C; Stawarczyk B; von Hajmasy A; Liebermann A
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(9):719-732. PubMed ID: 30202835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry.
Tarighi P; Khoroushi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Jul; 11(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 25225553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Expasyl® Gingival Retraction Paste on the Bond Strength of Self-etch and Total-etch Systems.
Al Baker AM; El Araby A; Al Amri MD; Sukumaran A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 26162250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding: a systematic review.
Bernades Kde O; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP; Garcia FC; Pereira PN
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1120-8. PubMed ID: 25359643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of three different contamination removal methods on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to dentin contaminated with an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent.
Ajami AA; Kahnamoii MA; Kimyai S; Oskoee SS; Pournaghi-Azar F; Bahari M; Firouzmandi M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 23579888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents.
Land MF; Couri CC; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 8933436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local and systemic effects of mechanico-chemical retraction.
Donaldson M; Goodchild JH
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34 Spec No 6():1-7; quiz p8. PubMed ID: 24350912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial activity of chemomechanical gingival retraction products.
Hsu B; Lee S; Schwass D; Tompkins G
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Jul; 148(7):493-499. PubMed ID: 28449940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of tooth-preparation cleansing protocol on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent.
Chaiyabutr Y; Kois JC
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 21488725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear bond strength of two adhesives to bovine dentin contaminated with various astringents.
Xu X; Chen Q; Lederer A; Bernau C; Lai G; Kaisarly D; Dent DM; Kunzelmann KH
Am J Dent; 2015 Aug; 28(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 26437505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An innovative tissue-retraction material.
Poss S
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jan; 23(1 Suppl):13-7; quiz 18-9. PubMed ID: 11913271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Cavity Contamination by Blood and Hemostatic Agents on Marginal Adaptation of Composite Restorations.
Groddeck S; Attin T; Tauböck TT
J Adhes Dent; 2017; 19(3):259-264. PubMed ID: 28580463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures.
Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):81-5.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25917854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis.
Sahu SK; Nagda SJ
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2021; 11(3):143-147. PubMed ID: 34458115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytotoxicity of hemostatic agents on the human gingival fibroblast.
Yalçin M; Barutcigil C; Umar I; Bozkurt BS; Hakki SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2013 Apr; 17(7):984-8. PubMed ID: 23640448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
