These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30202835)

  • 21. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
    Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of dentin contamination with two hemostatic agents on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with different conditioning.
    Saad A; Inoue G; Nikaido T; Abdou AMA; Sayed M; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2019 Mar; 38(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 30504695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bond strengths of a self-etching adhesive to dentin surfaces treated with saliva, blood, and different hemostatic agents.
    Unlu N; Cebe F; Cebe MA; Cetin AR; Cobanoglu N
    Gen Dent; 2015; 63(4):28-32. PubMed ID: 26147164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives.
    O'Keefe KL; Pinzon LM; Rivera B; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 16158807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dentists' knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods.
    Alraheam IA; Hattar S; Al-Asmar A; Alhadidi A; Hamour SA; Aldroubi A; Sawair FA
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):574. PubMed ID: 37587482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems.
    Takamizawa T; Barkmeier WW; Tsujimoto A; Berry TP; Watanabe H; Erickson RL; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):e9-21. PubMed ID: 26719131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of gingival inflammation related to different retraction agents].
    Sun XW; Sun GL; Xiao LJ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 26(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 18357884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EFFICACY OF HEMOSTATIC AGENTS IN ENDODONTIC SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.
    Khater AGA; Al-Hamed FS; Safwat EM; Hamouda MMA; Shehata MSA; Scarano A
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2021 Sep; 21(3):101540. PubMed ID: 34479672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test.
    Yeşilyurt C; Bulucu B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):26-36. PubMed ID: 16685292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
    Dent Update; 2014 Jun; 41(5):432-4, 437-8. PubMed ID: 25073225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
    Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.
    Igic M; Kostic M; Basic J; Krunic N; Pejcic A; Gligorijevic N; Milic Lemic A
    Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):492-498. PubMed ID: 32241014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cytotoxic potential of vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents: in vitro study on primary human gingival fibroblasts.
    Nowakowska D; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Choromanska A; Raszewski Z
    Folia Biol (Praha); 2012; 58(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22464823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords.
    Jokstad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 10050111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
    Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.
    Frankenberger R; Perdigão J; Rosa BT; Lopes M
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 11445203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
    Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; De Munck J; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jun; 22(6):533-44. PubMed ID: 16300826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review].
    Hong LG; Guo LP; Xue LL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Aug; 22(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 24100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.