These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30203229)

  • 1. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.
    Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T).
    Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of QM/MM Methods To Obtain Ligand-Binding Free Energies.
    Olsson MA; Ryde U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 May; 13(5):2245-2253. PubMed ID: 28355487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Relative Binding Affinity Using Nonequilibrium QM/MM Simulations.
    Wang M; Mei Y; Ryde U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Dec; 14(12):6613-6622. PubMed ID: 30362750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Host-Guest Relative Binding Affinities at Density-Functional Theory Level from Semiempirical Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Wang M; Mei Y; Ryde U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2659-2671. PubMed ID: 30811192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host-guest binding energies.
    Mikulskis P; Cioloboc D; Andrejić M; Khare S; Brorsson J; Genheden S; Mata RA; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):375-400. PubMed ID: 24700414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.
    Nishikawa N; Han K; Wu X; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1075-1086. PubMed ID: 30324304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Converging ligand-binding free energies obtained with free-energy perturbations at the quantum mechanical level.
    Olsson MA; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Jun; 37(17):1589-600. PubMed ID: 27117350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
    Bansal N; Zheng Z; Cerutti DS; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 27699553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.
    Hudson PS; Han K; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):983-999. PubMed ID: 30276502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
    Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.
    Eken Y; Almeida NMS; Wang C; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 33150463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative Ligand-Binding Free Energies Calculated from Multiple Short QM/MM MD Simulations.
    Steinmann C; Olsson MA; Ryde U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3228-3237. PubMed ID: 29768915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
    Tofoleanu F; Lee J; Pickard Iv FC; König G; Huang J; Baek M; Seok C; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):107-118. PubMed ID: 27696242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.
    Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods.
    Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Genheden S; Ryde U
    Interdiscip Sci; 2010 Mar; 2(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 20640794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. QM/MM-PBSA method to estimate free energies for reactions in proteins.
    Kaukonen M; Söderhjelm P; Heimdal J; Ryde U
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Oct; 112(39):12537-48. PubMed ID: 18781715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.