246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30203347)
1. Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement.
Khan I; Zhao M; Khan SU
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(31):31474-31485. PubMed ID: 30203347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin's impression.
Khan SU; Liu G; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Khan AA; Ali MAS; Misbahullah
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3100-3112. PubMed ID: 31838703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems.
Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Fahad S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25247-25261. PubMed ID: 31256403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of individual preferences for integrated river basin management: an example of Heihe river basin.
Khan I; Khan SU; Zhao M; Khan AA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):6911-6921. PubMed ID: 30644048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management.
Khan I; Zhao M
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():821-831. PubMed ID: 30064108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does location of the households' matters? Identifying the households' willingness to pay and preference heterogeneity in advancement of vulnerable ecosystem services: An approach of choice experiment.
Ali MAS; Zhang Z; Khan SU; Khan AA; Musa M; Rahman P; Hayat Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(11):29859-29873. PubMed ID: 36422782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do residential localities matter? Revisiting preference heterogeneity and ranking of ecological attributes of an inland river basin.
Khan I; Lei H; Muhammad I; Zhao M
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Apr; 763():142970. PubMed ID: 33121777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prioritizing stakeholders' preferences for policy scenarios of vulnerable ecosystems with spatial heterogeneity in choice experiment: Coupling stated preferences with elevation.
Khan A; Khan SU; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Zhao M
J Environ Manage; 2022 May; 310():114757. PubMed ID: 35220093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for River Ecosystem Services.
Khan I; Lei H; Ali G; Ali S; Zhao M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31581565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valuation of ecosystem services using choice experiment with preference heterogeneity: A benefit transfer analysis across inland river basin.
Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Khan AA; Ali MAS
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 679():126-135. PubMed ID: 31082587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the spatial preferences heterogeneity to upgrade the endemic ecological attributes for a cleaner environment: Evaluating the feasibility of benefit transfer among sub-basins of an inland river.
Ali MAS; Yi L; Khan SU; Khan AA; Musa M; Yang L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(52):79357-79374. PubMed ID: 35708806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Integrated assessment of ecosystem quality of arid inland river basin based on RS and GIS: A case study on Shiyang River Basin, Northwest China].
Liang BB; Shi PJ; Wang W; Tang X; Zhou WX; Jing Y
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Jan; 28(1):199-209. PubMed ID: 29749204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residential preferences for river network improvement: an exploration of choice experiments in Zhujiajiao, Shanghai, China.
Che Y; Li W; Shang Z; Liu C; Yang K
Environ Manage; 2014 Sep; 54(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 25011532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public perception of an ecological rehabilitation project in inland river basins in northern China: Success or failure.
Feng Q; Miao Z; Li Z; Li J; Si J; S Y; Chang Z
Environ Res; 2015 May; 139():20-30. PubMed ID: 25686489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychological distance and physical distance induced residents' heterogeneous willingness to pay for transboundary watershed ecosystem services in the Wei River Basin, China.
Shi Y; Li C; Zhao M; Ni Q
Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 72(6):1259-1276. PubMed ID: 37402887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ranking of ecosystem services on the basis of willingness to pay: Monetary assessment of a subset of ecosystem services in the Heihe River basin.
Ali MAS; Khan SU; Khan A; Khan AA; Zhao M
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Sep; 734():139447. PubMed ID: 32464395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Temporal stability of river ecological restoration based on the assessment of contingent valuation method: a case study of Shanghai urban river].
Zhang YF; Wang D
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Apr; 24(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 23898647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Farmers' Heterogeneous Willingness to Pay for Farmland Non-Market Goods and Services on the Basis of a Mixed Logit Model-A Case Study of Wuhan, China.
Yang X; Zhang A; Zhang F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparing the value of ecological protection in Sanjiang Plain wetland, Northeast China based on the stated preference method.].
Fan ZJ; Ao CL; Mao BQ; Chen HG; Wang XD
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Feb; 28(2):500-508. PubMed ID: 29749158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Willingness to pay for ecosystem services of urban river in Shanghai].
Zhao J; Yang K; Tai J; Wu EN
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Mar; 26(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 16004291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
