BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30204676)

  • 21. Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
    Heine N; Hoesl V; Seitz S; Prantl L; Brebant V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 305(4):937-943. PubMed ID: 34554314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictors of Complications and Comparison of Outcomes Using SurgiMend Fetal Bovine and AlloDerm Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrices in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Ricci JA; Treiser MD; Tao R; Jiang W; Guldbrandsen G; Halvorson E; Hergrueter CA; Chun YS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):583e-591e. PubMed ID: 27673529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From Salvage to Prevention: A Single-Surgeon Experience with Acellular Dermal Matrix and Infection in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Powers JM; Reuter Muñoz KD; Parkerson J; Nigro LC; Blanchet NP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Dec; 148(6):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 34644266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center.
    Selber JC; Wren JH; Garvey PB; Zhang H; Erickson C; Clemens MW; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 26111310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.
    Ng TP; Loo BYK; Yong N; Chia CLK; Lohsiriwat V
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):3366-3376. PubMed ID: 38285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 440 Consecutive immediate, implant-based, single-surgeon breast reconstructions in 281 patients: a comparison of early outcomes and costs between SurgiMend fetal bovine and AlloDerm human cadaveric acellular dermal matrices.
    Butterfield JL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):940-951. PubMed ID: 23629076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.
    Weichman KE; Wilson SC; Weinstein AL; Hazen A; Levine JP; Choi M; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 May; 129(5):1049-1058. PubMed ID: 22544088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
    Karp NS; Salibian AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Evaluation of complications and safety.
    Kalstrup J; Balslev Willert C; Brinch-Møller Weitemeyer M; Hougaard Chakera A; Hölmich LR
    Breast; 2021 Dec; 60():192-198. PubMed ID: 34688959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases.
    Hille-Betz U; Kniebusch N; Wojcinski S; Henseler H; Heyl V; Ohlinger R; Paepke S; Klapdor R; Krause-Bergmann B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 25300607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Urban C; González E; Fornazari A; Berman G; Spautz C; Kuroda F; Furlan Anselmi K; Rabinovich I; Dória M; Nissen L; Schünemann E; Sobreiro B; Lima R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov; 150(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 35994351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes.
    Jordan SW; Khavanin N; Fine NA; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 25068318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unilateral preoperative chest wall irradiation in bilateral tissue expander breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a prospective outcomes analysis.
    Weichman KE; Cemal Y; Albornoz CR; McCarthy CM; Pusic AL; Mehrara BJ; Disa JJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):921-927. PubMed ID: 23385983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
    Han WY; Han SJ; Kim EK; Han HH; Eom JS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():461-466. PubMed ID: 37944457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the Safety of a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm Construct in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Sigalove S; O'Rorke E; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 150():75S-81S. PubMed ID: 35943912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix.
    Ibrahim AMS; Shuster M; Koolen PGL; Kim K; Taghinia AH; Sinno HH; Lee BT; Lin SJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Nov; 132(5):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 24165587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
    Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Breast in a Day": Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Choi M; Frey JD; Alperovich M; Levine JP; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 138(2):184e-191e. PubMed ID: 27465178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
    Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.