These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

793 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30205284)

  • 21. Age-related differences in takeover performance: A comparative analysis of older and younger drivers in prolonged partially automated driving.
    Pan H; Payre W; Xu J; Koppel S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38860883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Supervising the self-driving car: Situation awareness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    McKerral A; Pammer K; Gauld C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jul; 187():107068. PubMed ID: 37075544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up.
    Wörle J; Metz B; Othersen I; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105617. PubMed ID: 32540623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing the physiological effect of non-driving-related task performance and task modality in conditionally automated driving systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coyne R; Ryan L; Moustafa M; Smeaton AF; Corcoran P; Walsh JC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107243. PubMed ID: 37651857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Imminent Take-Over Requests With Real Automation on a Test Track.
    Wintersberger P; Schartmüller C; Sadeghian S; Frison AK; Riener A
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1776-1792. PubMed ID: 34911393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
    Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions.
    Yoon SH; Kim YW; Ji YG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():150-158. PubMed ID: 30503824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Take-over performance in evasive manoeuvres.
    Happee R; Gold C; Radlmayr J; Hergeth S; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():211-222. PubMed ID: 28645018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the physiological effect of non-driving-related task performance in conditionally automated driving systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
    Coyne R; Ryan L; Moustafa M; Smeaton AF; Corcoran P; Walsh JC
    Digit Health; 2023; 9():20552076231174782. PubMed ID: 37188078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.
    Ma S; Zhang W; Yang Z; Kang C; Wu C; Chai C; Shi J; Li H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(7):482-487. PubMed ID: 32822218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exploring the effectiveness of a digital voice assistant to maintain driver alertness in partially automated vehicles.
    Mahajan K; Large DR; Burnett G; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):378-383. PubMed ID: 33881365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.