These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

666 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30205284)

  • 41. How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload.
    Ko SM; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():237-245. PubMed ID: 29122195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
    Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Modeling takeover time based on non-driving-related task attributes in highly automated driving.
    Yoon SH; Lee SC; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103343. PubMed ID: 33348112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. This Is Your Brain on Autopilot: Neural Indices of Driver Workload and Engagement During Partial Vehicle Automation.
    McDonnell AS; Simmons TG; Erickson GG; Lohani M; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1435-1450. PubMed ID: 34414813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of different alcohol levels on take-over performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Wiedemann K; Naujoks F; Wörle J; Kenntner-Mabiala R; Kaussner Y; Neukum A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():89-97. PubMed ID: 29550612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of levels of automation and non-driving related tasks on driver performance and workload: A review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Shahini F; Zahabi M
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Oct; 104():103824. PubMed ID: 35724471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System While Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks.
    Ataya A; Kim W; Elsharkawy A; Kim S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33801147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Drivers' visual-distracted take-over performance model and its application on adaptive adjustment of time budget.
    Li Q; Hou L; Wang Z; Wang W; Zeng C; Yuan Q; Cheng B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106099. PubMed ID: 33770718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Expert-based controllability assessment of control transitions from automated to manual driving.
    Naujoks F; Wiedemann K; Schömig N; Jarosch O; Gold C
    MethodsX; 2018; 5():579-592. PubMed ID: 29984191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving.
    Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
    Wandtner B; Schömig N; Schmidt G
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29617161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gold C; Happee R; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():3-13. PubMed ID: 29196019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.