218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30205539)
1. What Explains Education Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States? A Comparison with The Netherlands.
Koç H; O'Donnell O; Van Ourti T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30205539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.
Katz SJ; Hofer TP
JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 8046807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.
Sabatino SA; Coates RJ; Uhler RJ; Breen N; Tangka F; Shaw KM
Med Care; 2008 Jul; 46(7):692-700. PubMed ID: 18580388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Area-level Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Mammography Screening: A Multilevel Analysis of the Health of Houston Survey.
Calo WA; Vernon SW; Lairson DR; Linder SH
Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 26809487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Socioeconomic Status and Health Care Access in Breast Cancer Screening Compliance Among Hispanics.
Jadav S; Rajan SS; Abughosh S; Sansgiry SS
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2015; 21(5):467-76. PubMed ID: 25756197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social disparities in access to breast and cervical cancer screening by women living in Spain.
Ricardo-Rodrigues I; Jiménez-García R; Hernández-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Jiménez-Trujillo I; López de Andrés A
Public Health; 2015 Jul; 129(7):881-8. PubMed ID: 25818014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 years - United States, 2008.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2010 Jul; 59(26):813-6. PubMed ID: 20613705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study on the coverage of cervical and breast cancer screening among women aged 35-69 years and related impact of socioeconomic factors in China, 2013].
Bao HL; Wang LH; Wang LM; Fang LW; Zhang M; Zhao ZP; Cong S
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 39(2):208-212. PubMed ID: 29495207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of organized breast cancer screening on mammography use: Evidence from France.
Buchmueller TC; Goldzahl L
Health Econ; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1963-1980. PubMed ID: 30084221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening utilization and understanding of current guidelines among rural U.S. women with private insurance.
Peppercorn J; Houck K; Beri N; Villagra V; Wogu AF; Lyman GH; Wheeler SB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):659-67. PubMed ID: 26386956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The roles of citizenship status, acculturation, and health insurance in breast and cervical cancer screening among immigrant women.
Echeverria SE; Carrasquillo O
Med Care; 2006 Aug; 44(8):788-92. PubMed ID: 16862042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Receipt of mammography recommendations among White and non-White women before and after the 2009 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation change.
Gonzales FA; Taplin SH; Yu M; Breen N; Cronin KA
Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Aug; 27(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 27351918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors Associated with Breast Cancer Screening in a Country with National Health Insurance: Did We Succeed in Reducing Healthcare Disparities?
Hayek S; Enav T; Shohat T; Keinan-Boker L
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Feb; 26(2):159-168. PubMed ID: 27710162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of an organised screening program on socioeconomic inequalities in mammography practice, knowledge and attitudes.
Relecom A; Arzel B; Perneger T
Int J Equity Health; 2018 Jul; 17(1):95. PubMed ID: 29970090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disparities in the use of screening magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in community practice by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
Haas JS; Hill DA; Wellman RD; Hubbard RA; Lee CI; Wernli KJ; Stout NK; Tosteson AN; Henderson LM; Alford-Teaster JA; Onega TL
Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 26709819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities.
Horner-Johnson W; Dobbertin K; Iezzoni LI
Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 25864023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Socio-demographic correlates of participation in mammography: a survey among women aged between 35- 69 in Tehran, Iran.
Samah AA; Ahmadian M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(6):2717-20. PubMed ID: 22938447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
Pace LE; He Y; Keating NL
Cancer; 2013 Jul; 119(14):2518-23. PubMed ID: 23605683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the social gradients for Pap smears and mammograms in Argentina: evidence from the 2005 and 2009 National Risk Factor Surveys.
De Maio FG; Linetzky B; Ferrante D
Public Health; 2012 Oct; 126(10):821-6. PubMed ID: 23083845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Puri D; Weissman J; Moy B; Kopans DB; Kaine EM; Moore RH; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Tanabe KK; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
