These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3020601)

  • 21. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
    van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Expression of the bovine striatal D2 receptor, but not the D1 receptor, in bovine adrenal medulla.
    Maroto R; López MG; del Valle M; Naranjo JR; Mellström B; García AG
    Mol Pharmacol; 1995 Jan; 47(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 7838132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A rigorous multiple independent binding site model for determining cell-based equilibrium dissociation constants.
    Drake AW; Klakamp SL
    J Immunol Methods; 2007 Jan; 318(1-2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17141800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maximum likelihood estimation of the kinetics of receptor-mediated adhesion.
    Uz B; Arslan E; Laurenzi IJ
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Feb; 262(3):478-87. PubMed ID: 19835888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of ligand-binding data without knowledge of bound or free ligand molar concentration.
    Le Bonniec B; Sauloy J; Ducrocq R; Elion J
    Anal Biochem; 1988 Oct; 174(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 3218740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experimental design and estimation of parameters in complex radioligand binding systems.
    Staschen CM; Homer LD
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1996 Dec; 24(6):589-609. PubMed ID: 9300352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Model testing in radioligand/receptor interaction by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Bürgisser E
    J Recept Res; 1983; 3(1-2):261-81. PubMed ID: 6304303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. DESIGN: computerized optimization of experimental design for estimating Kd and Bmax in ligand binding experiments. I. Homologous and heterologous binding to one or two classes of sites.
    Rovati GE; Rodbard D; Munson PJ
    Anal Biochem; 1988 Nov; 174(2):636-49. PubMed ID: 3239764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Receptor binding kinetics equations: Derivation using the Laplace transform method.
    Hoare SRJ
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2018; 89():26-38. PubMed ID: 28818556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does a radiolabelled ligand bind to a homogeneous population of non-interacting receptor sites?
    Swillens S; Waelbroeck M; Champeil P
    Trends Pharmacol Sci; 1995 May; 16(5):151-5. PubMed ID: 7624969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of ligand heterogeneity on the Scatchard plot. Particular relevance to lipoprotein binding analysis.
    Mendel CM; Licko V; Kane JP
    J Biol Chem; 1985 Mar; 260(6):3451-5. PubMed ID: 2982861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two simple methods for quantifying low-affinity dye-substrate binding.
    Klunk WE; Pettegrew JW; Abraham DJ
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1989 Aug; 37(8):1293-7. PubMed ID: 2666512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Graphic presentation and analysis of inhibition data from ligand-binding experiments.
    Bylund DB
    Anal Biochem; 1986 Nov; 159(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 3028212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interpretation and analysis of receptor binding experiments which yield non-linear Scatchard plots and binding constants dependent upon receptor concentration.
    Pedersen JB; Lindup WE
    Biochem Pharmacol; 1994 Jan; 47(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 8304962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the validity and errors of the pseudo-first-order kinetics in ligand-receptor binding.
    Stroberg W; Schnell S
    Math Biosci; 2017 May; 287():3-11. PubMed ID: 27693063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A simple method for calculating the dissociation constant of a receptor (or enzyme).unlabeled ligand complex from radioligand displacement measurements.
    Martin RL; Renosto F; Segel IH
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 1991 Jan; 284(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 1989501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radioligand saturation binding for quantitative analysis of ligand-receptor interactions.
    Dong C; Liu Z; Wang F
    Biophys Rep; 2015; 1(3):148-155. PubMed ID: 27471749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of the harmonic mean to the determination of dissociation constants of stereoisomeric mixtures of biologically active compounds.
    Guevara-Salazar JA; Quintana-Zavala D; Jiménez-Vázquez HA; Trujillo-Ferrara J
    J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem; 2014 Dec; 29(6):884-94. PubMed ID: 24517366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Practical instructions for radioactively labeled ligand receptor binding studies.
    Schumacher C; von Tscharner V
    Anal Biochem; 1994 Oct; 222(1):262-9. PubMed ID: 7856859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of ligand-receptor binding by the difference method.
    Melikhova EM; Kurochkin IN; Zaitsev SV; Varfolomeev SD
    Anal Biochem; 1988 Dec; 175(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 2853584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.