These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
658 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30207118)
1. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study. Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study. Baumgartner H; Khan SS; DeRobertis M; Czer LS; Maurer G Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2275-83. PubMed ID: 1591841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch. Azadani AN; Jaussaud N; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Ge L; Guy TS; Guccione J; Tseng EE J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus. Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve bioprostheses. Gabbay S; McQueen DM; Yellin EL; Frater RW Circulation; 1979 Aug; 60(2 Pt 2):62-70. PubMed ID: 445776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis. Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical]. Badano L; Carratino L; De Gaetano G; Piazza R; Calisi P; Passerone G; Lucatti A G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8088472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. True external diameter better predicts hemodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic valves than the manufacturers' stated size. Cevasco M; Mick SL; Kwon M; Lee LS; Chen EP; Chen FY J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 May; 22(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 24151764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR. Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses. Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep]. Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamic Performance of Pericardial Bioprostheses in the Aortic Position. Lee H; Hwang HY; Sohn SH; Choi JW; Park JB; Kim KH; Kim KB Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 53(5):285-290. PubMed ID: 33020346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: an in vivo and in vitro study. Bech-Hanssen O; Caidahl K; Wallentin I; Ask P; Wranne B J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 11479501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter. Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]