173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30208245)
1. Variability in radiation dose and image quality: A comparison across fluoroscopy-system vendors, generations of equipment and institutions.
Hill KD; Mann SD; Carboni MP; Doyle TP; Idriss SF; Janssen DF; Nicholson GT; Sathanandam S; Fleming GA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):E471-E477. PubMed ID: 30208245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abstract 12670: Variability in Radiation Dose and Image Quality: A Comparison Across Fluoroscopy-system Vendors and Generations of Equipment.
Hill KD; Carboni MP; Doyle TP; Idriss S; Janssen D; Nicholson G; Sathanandam S; Mann S; Fleming G
Circulation; 2016 Nov; 134(suppl_1):A12670. PubMed ID: 30565952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom.
Christopoulos G; Christakopoulos GE; Rangan BV; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Latif F; Abu-Fadel M; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 26010374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A retrospective study of radiation dose measurements comparing different cath lab X-ray systems in a sample population of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions.
McNeice AH; Brooks M; Hanratty CG; Stevenson M; Spratt JC; Walsh SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):E254-E261. PubMed ID: 29411518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician-received scatter radiation with angiography systems used for interventional radiology: comparison among many X-ray systems.
Chida K; Morishima Y; Inaba Y; Taura M; Ebata A; Takeda K; Shimura H; Zuguchi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 22117021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisation: a potential for radiation reduction with air gap technique.
Chamberlain RC; Shindhelm AC; Wang C; Fleming GA; Hill KD
Cardiol Young; 2019 Dec; 29(12):1474-1480. PubMed ID: 31679554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing radiation exposure by lowering frame rate in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: A quality improvement study.
Amdani SM; Ross RD; Webster PA; Turner DR; Forbes TJ; Kobayashi D
Congenit Heart Dis; 2018 Nov; 13(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 30280489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.
Chida K; Inaba Y; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1680-5. PubMed ID: 19933664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of a fluoroscope to reduce radiation exposure in pediatric imaging.
Brown PH; Thomas RD; Silberberg PJ; Johnson LM
Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Apr; 30(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 10789900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation Protocol for Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography to Limit Procedural Radiation Exposure in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab.
Haddad L; Waller BR; Johnson J; Choudhri A; McGhee V; Zurakowski D; Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Sathanandam S
Congenit Heart Dis; 2016 Dec; 11(6):637-646. PubMed ID: 27079433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective anti-scatter grid removal during coronary angiography and PCI: a simple and safe technique for radiation reduction.
Roy JR; Sun P; Ison G; Prasan AM; Ford T; Hopkins A; Ramsay DR; Weaver JC
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 33(6):771-778. PubMed ID: 28120155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of the implementation of a simple radiation reduction protocol in the catheterization laboratory.
Jurado-Román A; Sánchez-Pérez I; Lozano Ruíz-Poveda F; López-Lluva MT; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Moreno Arciniegas A; Agudo-Quilez P; Gil Agudo A
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 27085219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective dose estimation for pediatric upper gastrointestinal examinations using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology.
Emigh B; Gordon CL; Connolly BL; Falkiner M; Thomas KE
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Sep; 43(9):1108-16. PubMed ID: 23529628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System.
Sullivan PM; Harrison D; Badran S; Takao CM; Ing FF
Pediatr Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 38(8):1583-1591. PubMed ID: 28770307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image noise reduction technology reduces radiation in a radial-first cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Gunja A; Pandey Y; Xie H; Wolska BM; Shroff AR; Ardati AK; Vidovich MI
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 28089778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of latest generation cardiac interventional X-ray equipment on patient image quality and radiation dose for trans-catheter aortic valve implantations.
Gislason-Lee AJ; Keeble C; Malkin CJ; Egleston D; Bexon J; Kengyelics SM; Blackman D; Davies AG
Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20160269. PubMed ID: 27610932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
