175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30209575)
1. Prospective study on metal ceramic crowns in private practice settings: 20-year results.
Reitemeier B; Hänsel K; Range U; Walter MH
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1823-1828. PubMed ID: 30209575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice settings.
Reitemeier B; Hänsel K; Kastner C; Weber A; Walter MH
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 23522363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zirconia-based versus metal-based single crowns veneered with overpressing ceramic for restoration of posterior endodontically treated teeth: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Monaco C; Llukacej A; Baldissara P; Arena A; Scotti R
J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():56-63. PubMed ID: 28736293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).
Sailer I; Makarov NA; Thoma DS; Zwahlen M; Pjetursson BE
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):603-23. PubMed ID: 25842099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design.
Boemicke W; Kappel S; Stober T; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24912399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study.
Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practice-based clinical evaluation of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 3-year results.
Rinke S; Schäfer S; Lange K; Gersdorff N; Roediger M
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Mar; 40(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 23211063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Valente NA; Strasding M; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():199-214. PubMed ID: 30328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
Walton TR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study.
Etman MK; Woolford MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 20141812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term follow-up of CeraOne™ single-implant restorations: an 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort.
Bergenblock S; Andersson B; Fürst B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 20586784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Six-year survival of single crowns - A massive data analysis.
Raedel M; Priess HW; Bohm S; Walter MH
J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103459. PubMed ID: 32866553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term behavior of double crown retained dentures with metal and metal-free secondary crowns and frameworks made of Vectris(©) on all-ceramic primary crowns: a prospective, randomized clinical trial up to 14 years.
Zahn T; Zahn B; Janko S; Weigl P; Gerhardt-Szép S; Lauer HC
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1087-100. PubMed ID: 26395350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
