These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30210399)

  • 1. Not All Phrases Are Equally Attractive: Experimental Evidence for Selective Agreement Attraction Effects.
    Parker D; An A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1566. PubMed ID: 30210399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing.
    Smith G; Franck J; Tabor W
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101356. PubMed ID: 33285355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximity and Same Case Marking Do Not Increase Attraction Effect in Comprehension: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Experiments in Korean.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1320. PubMed ID: 31244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misretrieval but not misrepresentation: A feature misbinding account of post-interpretive effects in number attraction.
    Dempsey J; Christianson K; Tanner D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Sep; 75(9):1727-1745. PubMed ID: 34763578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.
    Villata S; Tabor W; Franck J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2. PubMed ID: 29403414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attraction Effects in Honorific Agreement in Korean.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1302. PubMed ID: 27630594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Reading Signatures of Agreement Attraction.
    Lago S; Acuña Fariña C; Meseguer E
    Open Mind (Camb); 2021; 5():132-153. PubMed ID: 35024528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-dependency and structure-dependency in number interference effects in sentence comprehension.
    Franck J; Colonna S; Rizzi L
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():349. PubMed ID: 25914652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Retrieval Interference in Spoken Language Comprehension.
    Sekerina IA; Campanelli L; Van Dyke JA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():873. PubMed ID: 27378974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error-Driven Retrieval in Agreement Attraction Rarely Leads to Misinterpretation.
    Schlueter Z; Parker D; Lau E
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 31133936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic and Syntactic Interference in Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Working Memory Models.
    Tan Y; Martin RC; Van Dyke JA
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():198. PubMed ID: 28261133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local anaphor licensing in an SOV language: implications for retrieval strategies.
    Kush D; Phillips C
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1252. PubMed ID: 25414680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Argument status and PP-attachment.
    Boland JE; Blodgett A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Sep; 35(5):385-403. PubMed ID: 16838129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interference in the processing of adjunct control.
    Parker D; Lago S; Phillips C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1346. PubMed ID: 26441723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verbal Semantics Drives Early Anticipatory Eye Movements during the Comprehension of Verb-Initial Sentences.
    Sauppe S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():95. PubMed ID: 26903903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension.
    Speer SR; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):965-78. PubMed ID: 9796230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Representational Complexity and Memory Retrieval in Language Comprehension.
    Hofmeister P
    Lang Cogn Process; 2011; 26(3):376-405. PubMed ID: 22675235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying the role of phonology in sentence-level reading.
    Kush D; Johns CL; Van Dyke JA
    J Mem Lang; 2015; 79-80():18-29. PubMed ID: 26893535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic Attraction in Sentence Comprehension.
    Laurinavichyute A; von der Malsburg T
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Feb; 46(2):e13086. PubMed ID: 35122319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions.
    Kohen F; Milsark G; Martin N
    Aphasiology; 2011; 25(6-7):736-747. PubMed ID: 28133406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.