105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30213404)
41. [Establishment and application of three-dimensional model of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap based on computed tomography angiography].
Yang L; Fang BR; He JY; Wang XC
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 May; 34(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 29804428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Indications and Controversies for Nonabdominally-Based Complete Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction.
Opsomer D; van Landuyt K
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 29080664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Check the Record: Remote CT Scans for Breast Flap Perforator Mapping.
Sergesketter AR; Pyfer BJ; Phillips BT; Zhao R; Hollenbeck ST
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2018 Sep; 34(7):485-491. PubMed ID: 29605957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Time-dependent factors in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Laporta R; Longo B; Sorotos M; Farcomeni A; Amorosi V; Santanelli di Pompeo F
Microsurgery; 2017 Oct; 37(7):793-799. PubMed ID: 28758229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Optimizing Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Canizares O; Mayo J; Soto E; Allen RJ; Sadeghi A
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Aug; 75(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 26101983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Comparative Study Between Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator and Thoracoacromial Venous Supercharged Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps.
Ayestaray B; Yonekura K; Motomura H; Ziade M
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 26207537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evolution from the TUG to PAP flap for breast reconstruction: Comparison and refinements of technique.
Hunter JE; Lardi AM; Dower DR; Farhadi J
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):960-5. PubMed ID: 25913410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Perforator flap breast reconstruction after unsatisfactory implant reconstruction.
Levine SM; Lester ME; Fontenot B; Allen RJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 21301299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Abdominal perforator flap (DIEP) and autologous latissimus dorsi in breast reconstruction. A retrospective comparative study about the first 60 cases of a same surgeon].
Pluvy I; Bellidenty L; Ferry N; Benassarou M; Tropet Y; Pauchot J
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2014 Apr; 59(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 24268370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Paramuscular perforators in DIEAP flap for breast reconstruction.
Pons G; Masia J; Sanchez-Porro L; Larrañaga J; Clavero JA
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Dec; 73(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 23728240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.
Seidenstuecker K; Legler U; Munder B; Andree C; Mahajan A; Witzel C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 May; 69(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 27049776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Previous Bariatric Surgery: Is It Safe and Feasible?
Martinez CA; Walters JA; Sato EA; Hall JJ; Boutros SG
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 76(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 26756599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Optimizing shape and projection in low-volume bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction: Technical tips.
Senchenkov A; Lemaine V
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1313-4. PubMed ID: 25986419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Impact of Continuous Two-Team Approach in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Bauermeister AJ; Zuriarrain A; Newman M; Earle SA; Medina MA
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 May; 33(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 28201829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Paramuscular perforators in DIEAP flap for breast reconstruction: an important variation in perforator flap nomenclature.
Hallock GG
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74(6):745-6. PubMed ID: 25910027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Computed tomographic angiography imaging and clinical implications of internal mammary artery perforator vessels as recipient vessels in autologous breast reconstruction.
Fansa H; Schirmer S; Cervelli A; Gehl HB
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 22868328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The use of retrograde limb of internal mammary vein in autologous breast reconstruction with DIEAP flap: anatomical and clinical study.
Al-Dhamin A; Bissell MB; Prasad V; Morris SF
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Mar; 72(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 23238027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Paramuscular perforators in dieap flap for breast reconstruction: an important variation in perforator flap nomenclature: reply.
Pons G
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74(6):746. PubMed ID: 25969978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of autologous fat grafting in secondary microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Weichman KE; Broer PN; Tanna N; Wilson SC; Allan A; Levine JP; Ahn C; Choi M; Karp NS; Allen R
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23788122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Composite Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Case Report.
Blum CA; Frank D; Scott S; Chris T; Whitten WM
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2015 Sep; 31(7):541-3. PubMed ID: 26238483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
