BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30213713)

  • 1. National Private Payer Coverage of Prostate MRI.
    Booker MT; Silva E; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jan; 16(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 30213713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
    Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of radiographic staging studies in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
    Huncharek M; Muscat J
    Cancer Invest; 1995; 13(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 7530590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American Cancer Society--National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Results from multiple examinations using transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, and prostate specific antigen.
    Mettlin C; Murphy GP; Ray P; Shanberg A; Toi A; Chesley A; Babaian R; Badalament R; Kane RA; Lee F
    Cancer; 1993 Feb; 71(3 Suppl):891-8. PubMed ID: 7679042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the Detection, Evaluation, and Surveillance of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa).
    Patel P; Wang S; Siddiqui MM
    Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Sep; 20(10):60. PubMed ID: 31478113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.
    Tsui KH; Chang PL; Wang TM; Hsieh ML
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Mar; 20(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 9178589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of staging abdominal/pelvic computed tomography in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
    Huncharek M; Muscat J
    Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 8661585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
    Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
    NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical relevance of trans-rectal ultrasound, biopsy, and serum prostate-specific antigen following external beam radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate.
    Crook J; Robertson S; Collin G; Zaleski V; Esche B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Sep; 27(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 7690016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging techniques used to secure biopsies in prostate cancer patients.
    van Luijtelaar A; Bomers J; Fütterer J
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2019 Aug; 19(8):705-716. PubMed ID: 31277551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of PCA3 and multiparametric MRI's: collective benefits before deciding initial prostate biopsy for patients with PSA level between 3-10ng/mL.
    Okcelik S; Soydan H; Ates F; Berber U; Saygin H; Sonmez G; Karademir K
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 27286106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of prostate cancer on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy.
    Park SJ; Miyake H; Hara I; Eto H
    Int J Urol; 2003 Feb; 10(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 12588600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
    Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Felker ER; Lee-Felker SA; Feller J; Margolis DJ; Lu DS; Princenthal R; May S; Cohen M; Huang J; Yoshida J; Greenwood B; Kim HJ; Raman SS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):954-62. PubMed ID: 27118268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of methods of detection for prostate neoplasm].
    Zhong C; Chen M; Wan B
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2001 Jan; 23(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 11783074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.