251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30213717)
1. Comparison of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus para-aortic lymphadenectomy alone for locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer using a propensity score matching analysis: Results from the FRANCOGYN study group.
Bendifallah S; de Foucher T; Ouldamer L; Bricou A; Lavoue V; Varinot J; Canlorbe G; Carcopino X; Raimond E; Huguet F; Graesslin O; Touboul C; Collinet P; Huchon C; Daraï E; Ballester M;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1921-1928. PubMed ID: 30213717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patterns of recurrence and prognosis in locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer: Retrospective multicentre study from the FRANCOGYN group.
de Foucher T; Bendifallah S; Ouldamer L; Bricou A; Lavoue V; Varinot J; Canlorbe G; Carcopino X; Raimond E; Monnier L; Graesslin O; Touboul C; Collinet P; Neveu ME; Huchon C; Daraï E; Ballester M;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):659-665. PubMed ID: 30685326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of primary para-aortic lymphadenectomy on distant failure in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated in the era of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.
Chargari C; Mazeron R; Dunant A; Gouy S; Petit C; Maroun P; Uzan C; Annede P; Bentivegna E; Balleyguier C; Genestie C; Pautier P; Leary A; Lhomme C; Deutsch E; Morice P; Haie-Meder C
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2016 Dec; 33(8):775-785. PubMed ID: 27530648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical hysterectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: outcomes for a series of 308 patients.
Tsuruga T; Fujimoto A; Kawana K; Mori M; Hasumi Y; Kino N; Tomio K; Miura S; Tanikawa M; Sone K; Miyamoto Y; Ikeda Y; Kojima S; Adachi K; Nagasaka K; Matsumoto Y; Arimoto T; Oda K; Nakagawa S; Horie K; Yasugi T; Yokota H; Osuga Y; Fujii T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 21(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 26438230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Para-aortic lymph node staging in grade IB2 and above cervical cancers: Comparison of 18FDG PET-CT with para-aortic lymphadenectomy, using data from the Côte d'Or gynaecological cancer registry from 2003 to 2016].
Carré A; Sellier J; Kamga AM; Dabakuyo S; Rouffiac M; Coutant C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2021 Sep; 49(9):677-683. PubMed ID: 33484900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in advanced cervical cancer: prognostic and therapeutic value.
Del Pino M; Fusté P; Pahisa J; Rovirosa A; Martínez-Serrano MJ; Martínez-Román S; Alonso I; Vidal L; Ordi J; Torné A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1675-83. PubMed ID: 24172103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Para-aortic plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A single institutional experience.
Mezquita G; Muruzabal JC; Perez B; Aguirre S; Villafranca E; Jurado M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():79-83. PubMed ID: 30889424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage IA2-IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Revisiting the role of surgical assessment.
Del Carmen MG; Pareja R; Melamed A; Rodriguez J; Greer A; Clark RM; Rice LW
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):406-411. PubMed ID: 30017539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should the Presence of Metastatic Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Lead to More Aggressive Treatment Strategies?
Benito V; Carballo S; Silva P; Esparza M; Arencibia O; Federico M; Andújar M; Mori M; Medina N; Lubrano A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 28161495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008217. PubMed ID: 23543561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Apr; (4):CD008217. PubMed ID: 21491407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: A single-institute study.
Kikuchi A; Yanase T; Sasagawa M; Honma S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 May; 37(4):510-513. PubMed ID: 28421906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Fastrez M; Goffin F; Vergote I; Vandromme J; Petit P; Leunen K; Degueldre M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Aug; 92(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 23590725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic value of the presence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients; the influence of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC).
van Kol KGG; Ebisch RMF; van der Aa M; Wenzel HB; Piek JMJ; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 171():9-14. PubMed ID: 36804623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic impact of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on clinically-apparent stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis.
Yoshihara M; Kajiyama H; Tamauchi S; Iyoshi S; Yokoi A; Suzuki S; Kawai M; Nagasaka T; Takahashi K; Matsui S; Kikkawa F
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 50(2):145-151. PubMed ID: 31688935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
