These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30213768)

  • 1. Assessing the quality of single particle reconstructions by atomic model building.
    Mendez JH; Stagg SM
    J Struct Biol; 2018 Nov; 204(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 30213768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Map Challenge assessment: Fair comparison of single particle cryoEM reconstructions.
    Heymann JB
    J Struct Biol; 2018 Nov; 204(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 30030042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing apoferritin with the Appion pipeline.
    Stagg SM; Mendez JH
    J Struct Biol; 2018 Oct; 204(1):85-89. PubMed ID: 29969662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Multi-model Approach to Assessing Local and Global Cryo-EM Map Quality.
    Herzik MA; Fraser JS; Lander GC
    Structure; 2019 Feb; 27(2):344-358.e3. PubMed ID: 30449687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permutation testing of Fourier shell correlation for resolution estimation of cryo-EM maps.
    Beckers M; Sachse C
    J Struct Biol; 2020 Oct; 212(1):107579. PubMed ID: 32693019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DeepQs: Local quality assessment of cryo-EM density map by deep learning map-model fit score.
    Feng MF; Chen YX; Shen HB
    J Struct Biol; 2024 Mar; 216(1):108059. PubMed ID: 38160703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The first single particle analysis Map Challenge: A summary of the assessments.
    Heymann JB; Marabini R; Kazemi M; Sorzano COS; Holmdahl M; Mendez JH; Stagg SM; Jonic S; Palovcak E; Armache JP; Zhao J; Cheng Y; Pintilie G; Chiu W; Patwardhan A; Carazo JM
    J Struct Biol; 2018 Nov; 204(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 30114512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CryoRes: Local Resolution Estimation of Cryo-EM Density Maps by Deep Learning.
    Dai M; Dong Z; Xu K; Zhang QC
    J Mol Biol; 2023 May; 435(9):168059. PubMed ID: 36967040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. De novo main-chain modeling for EM maps using MAINMAST.
    Terashi G; Kihara D
    Nat Commun; 2018 Apr; 9(1):1618. PubMed ID: 29691408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refinement of Atomic Structures Against cryo-EM Maps.
    Murshudov GN
    Methods Enzymol; 2016; 579():277-305. PubMed ID: 27572731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cryo-EM model validation recommendations based on outcomes of the 2019 EMDataResource challenge.
    Lawson CL; Kryshtafovych A; Adams PD; Afonine PV; Baker ML; Barad BA; Bond P; Burnley T; Cao R; Cheng J; Chojnowski G; Cowtan K; Dill KA; DiMaio F; Farrell DP; Fraser JS; Herzik MA; Hoh SW; Hou J; Hung LW; Igaev M; Joseph AP; Kihara D; Kumar D; Mittal S; Monastyrskyy B; Olek M; Palmer CM; Patwardhan A; Perez A; Pfab J; Pintilie GD; Richardson JS; Rosenthal PB; Sarkar D; Schäfer LU; Schmid MF; Schröder GF; Shekhar M; Si D; Singharoy A; Terashi G; Terwilliger TC; Vaiana A; Wang L; Wang Z; Wankowicz SA; Williams CJ; Winn M; Wu T; Yu X; Zhang K; Berman HM; Chiu W
    Nat Methods; 2021 Feb; 18(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 33542514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FSC-Q: a CryoEM map-to-atomic model quality validation based on the local Fourier shell correlation.
    Ramírez-Aportela E; Maluenda D; Fonseca YC; Conesa P; Marabini R; Heymann JB; Carazo JM; Sorzano COS
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jan; 12(1):42. PubMed ID: 33397925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Cryo-EM Reconstructions and Validating Atomic Model Fit Using Difference Maps.
    Joseph AP; Lagerstedt I; Jakobi A; Burnley T; Patwardhan A; Topf M; Winn M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 May; 60(5):2552-2560. PubMed ID: 32043355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cryo-EM model validation using independent map reconstructions.
    DiMaio F; Zhang J; Chiu W; Baker D
    Protein Sci; 2013 Jun; 22(6):865-8. PubMed ID: 23592445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A New Protocol for Atomic-Level Protein Structure Modeling and Refinement Using Low-to-Medium Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps.
    Zhang B; Zhang X; Pearce R; Shen HB; Zhang Y
    J Mol Biol; 2020 Sep; 432(19):5365-5377. PubMed ID: 32771523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ResLog plots as an empirical metric of the quality of cryo-EM reconstructions.
    Stagg SM; Noble AJ; Spilman M; Chapman MS
    J Struct Biol; 2014 Mar; 185(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 24384117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural interpretation of cryo-EM image reconstructions.
    Beckers M; Mann D; Sachse C
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2021 Mar; 160():26-36. PubMed ID: 32735944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated Modeling and Validation of Protein Complexes in Cryo-EM Maps.
    Cragnolini T; Sweeney A; Topf M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2215():189-223. PubMed ID: 33368005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cryo-EM of macromolecular assemblies at near-atomic resolution.
    Baker ML; Zhang J; Ludtke SJ; Chiu W
    Nat Protoc; 2010 Sep; 5(10):1697-708. PubMed ID: 20885381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination.
    Scheres SH
    J Struct Biol; 2012 Dec; 180(3):519-30. PubMed ID: 23000701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.