These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30213774)

  • 1. Somatosensory responses to nothing: An MEG study of expectations during omission of tactile stimulations.
    Andersen LM; Lundqvist D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():78-89. PubMed ID: 30213774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tactile expectation modulates pre-stimulus beta-band oscillations in human sensorimotor cortex.
    van Ede F; Jensen O; Maris E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jun; 51(2):867-76. PubMed ID: 20188186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting differences with magnetoencephalography of somatosensory processing after tactile and electrical stimuli.
    Hautasaari P; Kujala UM; Tarkka IM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Jan; 311():331-337. PubMed ID: 30218670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural Basis of Early Somatosensory Change Detection: A Magnetoencephalography Study.
    Naeije G; Vaulet T; Wens V; Marty B; Goldman S; De Tiège X
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Mar; 31(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 28913778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tactile spatial attention enhances gamma-band activity in somatosensory cortex and reduces low-frequency activity in parieto-occipital areas.
    Bauer M; Oostenveld R; Peeters M; Fries P
    J Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 26(2):490-501. PubMed ID: 16407546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive flexibility of the within-hand attentional gradient in touch: An MEG study.
    Kida T; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():373-384. PubMed ID: 29936309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anticipation increases tactile stimulus processing in the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex.
    van Ede F; de Lange FP; Maris E
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2562-71. PubMed ID: 23645714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cerebellar clock: Predicting and timing somatosensory touch.
    Andersen LM; Dalal SS
    Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118202. PubMed ID: 34089874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Somatosensory cortical plasticity after toe-to-index transfer.
    Hadoush H; Sunagawa T; Nakanishi K; Ochi M
    Neuroreport; 2012 Dec; 23(17):1000-5. PubMed ID: 23044495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early integration of bilateral touch in the primary somatosensory cortex.
    Tamè L; Pavani F; Papadelis C; Farnè A; Braun C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Apr; 36(4):1506-23. PubMed ID: 25514844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Gating" effects of simultaneous peripheral electrical stimulations on human secondary somatosensory cortex: a whole-head MEG study.
    Torquati K; Pizzella V; Della Penna S; Franciotti R; Babiloni C; Romani GL; Rossini PM
    Neuroimage; 2003 Nov; 20(3):1704-13. PubMed ID: 14642480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation.
    Hesse MD; Nishitani N; Fink GR; Jousmäki V; Hari R
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Feb; 20(2):425-32. PubMed ID: 19505992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Tactile Window to Consciousness is Characterized by Frequency-Specific Integration and Segregation of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex.
    Frey JN; Ruhnau P; Leske S; Siegel M; Braun C; Weisz N
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20805. PubMed ID: 26864304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dominant Patterns of Information Flow in the Propagation of the Neuromagnetic Somatosensory Steady-State Response.
    Vakorin VA; Ross B; Doesburg SM; Ribary U; McIntosh AR
    Front Neural Circuits; 2018; 12():118. PubMed ID: 30697150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A parietal-frontal network studied by somatosensory oddball MEG responses, and its cross-modal consistency.
    Huang MX; Lee RR; Miller GA; Thoma RJ; Hanlon FM; Paulson KM; Martin K; Harrington DL; Weisend MP; Edgar JC; Canive JM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 15979344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fluctuations of prestimulus oscillatory power predict subjective perception of tactile simultaneity.
    Lange J; Halacz J; van Dijk H; Kahlbrock N; Schnitzler A
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Nov; 22(11):2564-74. PubMed ID: 22114082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complexity analysis of source activity underlying the neuromagnetic somatosensory steady-state response.
    Vakorin VA; Ross B; Krakovska O; Bardouille T; Cheyne D; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 20132893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prominent activation of the intraparietal and somatosensory areas during angle discrimination by intra-active touch.
    Yang J; Han H; Chui D; Shen Y; Wu J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Dec; 33(12):2957-70. PubMed ID: 22020967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action-Dependent Processing of Touch in the Human Parietal Operculum and Posterior Insula.
    Limanowski J; Lopes P; Keck J; Baudisch P; Friston K; Blankenburg F
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Mar; 30(2):607-617. PubMed ID: 31211363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using somatosensory mismatch responses as a window into somatotopic processing of tactile stimulation.
    Shen G; Smyk NJ; Meltzoff AN; Marshall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13030. PubMed ID: 29139557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.