These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30214016)
1. Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation. Whang WJ; Yoo YS; Kang MJ; Joo CK Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13732. PubMed ID: 30214016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry. Lee HK; Kim MK BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):269. PubMed ID: 30340561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study. An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOLMaster. Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Aramberri J; Huang J; Barboni P J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct; 33(10):690-695. PubMed ID: 28991337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry. Song MY; Noh SR; Kim KY PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251152. PubMed ID: 33945581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of two optical biometry devices: high wavelength swept source OCT versus partial coherence interferometry. Szalai E; Csutak A Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):627-634. PubMed ID: 34633606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes. Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard. Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster). Ha A; Wee WR; Kim MK Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 29770644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry. Tañá-Sanz P; Rodríguez-Carrillo MD; Ruiz-Santos M; Montés-Micó R; Ruiz-Mesa R; Tañá-Rivero P Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1219-1234. PubMed ID: 34806515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of the VRF and VRF-G Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry. Voytsekhivskyy OV Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():3663-3672. PubMed ID: 38050557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation and comparison of a novel Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with standard partial coherence interferometry for biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Wang Z; Yang W; Li D; Chen W; Zhao Q; Li Y; Cui R; Shen L; Xian J Exp Ther Med; 2021 Apr; 21(4):326. PubMed ID: 33732299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of SS-OCT biometry compared with partial coherence interferometry biometry for combined phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. Vounotrypidis E; Haralanova V; Muth DR; Wertheimer C; Shajari M; Wolf A; Priglinger S; Mayer WJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jan; 45(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 30309772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers. Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of axial length using a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer - ARGOS with partial coherence interferometry- based biometer -IOLMaster among school children. Hussaindeen JR; Mariam EG; Arunachalam S; Bhavatharini R; Gopalakrishnan A; Narayanan A; Agarkar S; Sivaraman V PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209356. PubMed ID: 30589874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]