These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30214262)

  • 1. Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar.
    Schwartzberg LS; Lal LS; Balu S; Campbell K; Brekke L; Elliott C; Korrer S
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2018; 10():493-500. PubMed ID: 30214262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Outcomes of Treatment with Filgrastim Versus a Filgrastim Biosimilar and Febrile Neutropenia-Associated Costs Among Patients with Nonmyeloid Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.
    Schwartzberg LS; Lal LS; Balu S; Campbell K; Brekke L; DeLeon A; Elliott C; Korrer S
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Oct; 24(10):976-984. PubMed ID: 29687743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Brand and Biosimilar Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors for Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia.
    Douglas AG; Schwab P; Lane D; Kennedy K; Slabaugh SL; Bowe A
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 29172983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.
    McBride A; Campbell K; Bikkina M; MacDonald K; Abraham I; Balu S
    J Med Econ; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 28722494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-Administered Biologic and Biosimilar Filgrastim May Offer More Affordable Options for Patients with Nonmyeloid Malignancies Receiving Chemotherapy in the United States: A Budget Impact Analysis from the Payer Perspective.
    Trautman H; Szabo E; James E; Tang B
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2019 Jan; 25(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 30084301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio®) initiated "same-day" (< 24 h), "per-guidelines" (24-72 h), and "late" (> 72 h): findings from the MONITOR-GCSF study.
    Ludwig H; Gascón P; Bokemeyer C; Aapro M; Boccadoro M; Denhaerynck K; Krendyukov A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Jun; 27(6):2301-2312. PubMed ID: 30343410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A single-center, retrospective analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of filgrastim-sndz to filgrastim for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and for neutrophil recovery following autologous stem cell transplantation.
    Zecchini J; Yum K; Steinberg A; Smith C; Kim S
    Support Care Cancer; 2018 Mar; 26(3):1013-1016. PubMed ID: 28990128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment patterns and outcomes in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim (the MONITOR-GCSF study).
    Gascón P; Aapro M; Ludwig H; Bokemeyer C; Boccadoro M; Turner M; Denhaerynck K; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):911-925. PubMed ID: 26306517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of alternating treatment with EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, and reference filgrastim: a phase III, randomised, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Blackwell K; Gascon P; Krendyukov A; Gattu S; Li Y; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):244-249. PubMed ID: 29091995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Blackwell K; Semiglazov V; Krasnozhon D; Davidenko I; Nelyubina L; Nakov R; Stiegler G; Singh P; Schwebig A; Kramer S; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1948-1953. PubMed ID: 26122726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biosimilar filgrastim treatment patterns and prevention of febrile neutropenia: a prospective multicentre study in France in patients with solid tumours (the ZOHé study).
    Roché H; Eymard JC; Radji A; Prevost A; Diab R; Lamuraglia M; Soumoudronga RF; Gasnereau I; Toledano A
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1127. PubMed ID: 30445935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. G-CSF filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with rest periods not exceeding 14 days: A French, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study.
    Phelip JM; Souquet PJ; Hacini M; Chehimi M; Bourgeois V; Bennoune R; Tredan O
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2023; 35():100690. PubMed ID: 36780734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary Prophylaxis With Biosimilar Filgrastim for Patients at Intermediate Risk for Febrile Neutropenia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Li E; Mezzio DJ; Campbell D; Campbell K; Lyman GH
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1235-e1245. PubMed ID: 33793342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in elderly versus non-elderly cancer patients: Patterns, outcomes, and determinants (MONITOR-GCSF study).
    Aapro M; Bokemeyer C; Ludwig H; Gascón P; Boccadoro M; Denhaerynck K; Gorray M; Krendyukov A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Geriatr Oncol; 2017 Mar; 8(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 27829539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-World Noninferiority Assessment of Two Filgrastim Biosimilars in Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy.
    Lee YJ; Delate T; Hui RL; Le K; Pham C
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2024 Jul; ():OP2400047. PubMed ID: 39047215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.