These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30214323)
1. Spotlight on the Linx™ Reflux Management System for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: evidence and research. Zadeh J; Andreoni A; Treitl D; Ben-David K Med Devices (Auckl); 2018; 11():291-300. PubMed ID: 30214323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LINX Skubleny D; Switzer NJ; Dang J; Gill RS; Shi X; de Gara C; Birch DW; Wong C; Hutter MM; Karmali S Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 27981382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease. Zhang H; Dong D; Liu Z; He S; Hu L; Lv Y Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3684-90. PubMed ID: 26659236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication. Wu H; Attaar M; Wong HJ; Campbell M; Kuchta K; Denham W; Linn J; Ujiki MB Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7709-7716. PubMed ID: 35169878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: Surgical Technique and Results of a Single-center Cohort Study. Asti E; Siboni S; Lazzari V; Bonitta G; Sironi A; Bonavina L Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):941-945. PubMed ID: 27163959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Aiolfi A; Asti E; Bernardi D; Bonitta G; Rausa E; Siboni S; Bonavina L Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():82-88. PubMed ID: 29471155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of a novel, non-active implantable device as a treatment for refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Harper S; Grodzicki L; Mealing S; Gemmill L; Goldsmith PJ; Ahmed AR J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):603-613. PubMed ID: 37042668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis. Guidozzi N; Wiggins T; Ahmed AR; Hanna GB; Markar SR Dis Esophagus; 2019 Nov; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 31069388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. LINX(®) Reflux Management System in chronic gastroesophageal reflux: a novel effective technology for restoring the natural barrier to reflux. Bonavina L; Saino G; Lipham JC; Demeester TR Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 6(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 23814607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative trial of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication. Sheu EG; Nau P; Nath B; Kuo B; Rattner DW Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):505-9. PubMed ID: 25012804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies. Asti E; Aiolfi A; Lazzari V; Sironi A; Porta M; Bonavina L Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):323-330. PubMed ID: 30022361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: laparoscopic or robotic approach? Maharsi S; Lipham JC; Houghton CC Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36484296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD. Richards WO; McRae C Am Surg; 2018 Nov; 84(11):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 30747630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective. Pandolfino J; Lipham J; Chawla A; Ferko N; Hogan A; Qadeer RA Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1561-1572. PubMed ID: 31559575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LINX(™) Reflux Management System: magnetic sphincter augmentation in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Bonavina L; DeMeester TR; Ganz RA Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Dec; 6(6):667-74. PubMed ID: 23237251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication versus magnetic sphincter augmentation: Observational cohort study with propensity score analysis. Asti E; Bonitta G; Lovece A; Lazzari V; Bonavina L Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(30):e4366. PubMed ID: 27472725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Valinoti AC; Angeramo CA; Dreifuss N; Herbella FAM; Schlottmann F Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2024; 36():e1781. PubMed ID: 38451590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients. Halpern SE; Gupta A; Jawitz OK; Choi AY; Salfity HV; Klapper JA; Hartwig MG J Thorac Dis; 2021 Apr; 13(4):2116-2127. PubMed ID: 34012562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]